Current filters:  
Asia Pacific
Gilchrist Connell
The article considers the potential impact on future shareholder class actions if the proposed amendments are enacted.
Law In Order
COVID-19 continues to have significant impact on litigation proceedings, with data management and eDiscovery challenges.
Sydney Criminal Lawyers
There will be a single point of entry and a common set of rules, procedures, practices and approaches to case management.
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Since the pandemic, courts have been using technology to facilitate inter party communications during virtual hearings.
Ramsden Lawyers
When drafting formal offers to settle, you must expressly stipulate the amount payable for all claims and counterclaims.
Coleman Greig Lawyers
The Court found that the ABC program severely damaged Chau's reputation, and called for a significant award of damages.
The options you have when someone leaves a bad review online.
Stacks Law Firm
The Federal Court awarded $875,000 in damages against a person who posted "vile" unfounded conspiracy theories online.
China's Antimonopoly Law (AML) came into force on 1 August 2008. The AML prohibits monopoly agreements, abuses of dominant market positions, anticompetitive concentrations, and administrative monopolies.
Arnold & Porter
Since we last wrote about the coronavirus-related lawsuits brought against China a few months ago, there have been few relevant developments.
Hong Kong
Morrison & Foerster LLP
On February 9, 2021, the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre ("HKIAC") released its annual case statistics for 2020.
Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas
The Court has also reiterated the legal position on limited interference by Courts in international arbitrations.
Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas
As per Article 15.5 of the PSC, the Respondents were entitled to recover a certain sum of monies as its base development costs.
Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas
It was further held that the Evidence Act does not contemplate or permit proof of an electronic record by oral evidence if the requirements under Section 65B are not complied with.
Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas
In Shakti Bhog Food Industries Ltd. v. The Central Bank of India and Anr.
On 3 February 2021, a three-judge bench of the Supreme Court of India passed a judgment in the matter of Phoenix ARC Private Limited v. Ketulbhai Ramubhai Patel (Judgement)
Obhan & Associates
The Supreme Court, recently, in the case of Phoenix Arc Private Limited v. Spade Financial Services Limited 1, held that the intent of Sec. 21 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code...
Khurana and Khurana
In the recent Judgement passed by NCDRC on 21st December 2020, NCDRC held the bank liable for the online fraudulent transactions if there is no fault on the customer's part.
Phoenix Legal
In a recent order passed in the matter of Union of India v. M/s Associated Construction Co. , the Hon'ble Supreme Court highlighted the uncertainty surrounding the period of limitation applicable on appeals filed under Section 37.
In the recent decision of Yakin Tenggara Sdn Bhd v Gula Perak Berhad & 3 Ors and other appeals, our Apex Court had the opportunity to consider the effect of the appointment of both Tun Md Raus Sharif ("CJ") and ...
FREE News Alerts
Sign Up for our free News Alerts - All the latest articles on your chosen topics condensed into a free bi-weekly email.
Popular Contributors
Upcoming Events
Font Size:
Mondaq Social Media