Current filters:  
United States
Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani
The dog toy industry has drawn the ire of many famous brands; one of the latest examples is VIP Products's "Bad Spaniels Silly Squeaker" dog toy, fashioned to resemble Jack Daniel's Old No. 7
Dickinson Wright PLLC
On December 27, 2020, President Trump signed the highly anticipated COVID-19 stimulus relief and government-funding bill.
Winston & Strawn LLP
Following trial, a jury found patent infringement and awarded damages based on sales of the accused products. The damages calculation was based on a 3% royalty on $2.99 billion in sales.
As 2021 begins and intellectual property (IP) strategies are being developed for the new year, it is a good time to reflect on what IP issues were prominent in 2020.
Winston & Strawn LLP
The Federal Circuit considered two questions: 1) whether the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's decision that a patent qualified for covered business method (CBM) review was reviewable on...
Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer Baratz
A recent Federal Circuit decision denying a petition for a writ of mandamus should serve as a cautionary tale and reminder for corporate entities regarding ...
Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP
In Donner Technology, LLC v. Pro Stage Gear, LLC, Appeal. No. 20-1104 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 9, 2020), the Federal Circuit vacated and remanded the PTAB's decision that...
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Mayweather Promotions ("MP") attempted to register PAST PRESENT FUTURE for use on t-shirts.
Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
Section viii of the Hatch-Waxman Act permits an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) applicant to obtain FDA approval to market a generic version of a drug for a non-patented use...
Cowan Liebowitz & Latman PC
Although trademarks, copyrights, patents, and trade secrets all concern intangible property rights and overlap to some extent, they differ from each other significantly.
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
In ABS Global Inc., v. Cytonome/St, LLC, the Federal Circuit dismissed as moot an appeal of an inter partes review (IPR) upholding the patentability of some claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,529,161.
Harris Bricken
Far too many companies that have their products made overseas wrongly assume they will own the molds and the accompanying IP used to make their products.
Winston & Strawn LLP
Network-1 sued several defendants, including HP, for infringement of the U.S. Patent No. 6,218,930 in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.
Winston & Strawn LLP
In May, Judge Albright orally denied Apple's § 1404(a) motion to transfer the case filed by Uniloc to the Northern District of California.
Winston & Strawn LLP
Valeant Pharmaceuticals North America LLC et al. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al., No. 2019-2402 (Fed. Cir. November 5, 2020)
Winston & Strawn LLP
This case considers the appropriate standard for determining if prior art is analogous for purposes of determining unpatentability.
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
The Board affirmed a refusal to register the mark shown below, consisting of a red oval with a white border (acting as a carrier for the words "MELISSA & DOUG") for various toys...
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Even when a Preliminary Amendment is included with the filing of a new application, a claim listing is required and the claim listing must include a listing of every claim ever presented.
Winston & Strawn LLP
Patent Owner's Ex Parte Communications With Members Of Congress, The President, And PTAB APJs Are Sanctionable And The Board May Craft Its Own Reasonable Sanctions
WilmerHale Partner Louis Tompros and Counsel Stephanie Lin discuss the Pepe the Frog copyright infringement case with host John Walsh.
Mondaq Webinars
Webinar Copenhagen Denmark
FREE News Alerts
Sign Up for our free News Alerts - All the latest articles on your chosen topics condensed into a free bi-weekly email.
Popular Contributors
Upcoming Events
Font Size:
Mondaq Social Media