United States: Context, Reasons, Hedges, And Disclaimers: The Supreme Court’s Ruling In Omnicare May Shape Whether And How Companies Express Opinions

Last Updated: April 7 2015
Article by Jordan Eth and Mark R.S. Foster

The Supreme Court's decision yesterday in Omnicare Inc. v. The Laborers District Council Construction Industry Pension Fund, No. 13-435 (U.S. March 23, 2015) articulated the standard of liability for statements of opinion. At its core, the decision endorses the uncontroversial notion that public companies must have a reasonable basis supporting any opinions they disclose. What constitutes a reasonable basis will depend on what a reasonable investor would expect, unless the opinion is accompanied by disclosure of the actual basis for the expressed opinion.

Strictly speaking, the Omnicare ruling addresses the standard of liability for statements of opinion published in registration statements that are filed in connection with a public offering of securities. The ruling, however, might have some spillover effect that shapes whether and how public companies and those that speak on their behalf express opinions in other types of investor communications. To minimize the risk of liability, Omnicare hints of a new best practice: either don't opine (which may not be practical in many cases), or accompany any volunteered opinion with the actual reasons supporting it, and appropriate context, including "hedges, disclaimers, or qualifications."1 More disclosure, not less, may be the order of the day.


In Omnicare, the Supreme Court addressed the standard of civil liability under Section 11 of the Securities Act for statements of opinion. Section 11 applies to statements contained in registration statements that are issued in connection with initial public offerings and other registered securities offerings.

The plaintiffs alleged that Omnicare violated Section 11 when it expressed its belief, in connection with its public offering of common stock, that the company complied with legal requirements. For example, Omnicare stated: "We believe our contract arrangements . . . are in compliance with applicable federal and state laws."2 After those statements were published, the federal government filed civil complaints alleging that Omnicare received payments that violated anti-kickback laws. According to the plaintiffs, Omnicare's statements were materially misleading because Omnicare did not disclose that it was violating the law. To support that claim, the plaintiffs alleged that one of Omnicare's attorneys had warned that a particular contract carried a risk of liability under the anti-kickback laws. The district court granted Omnicare's motion to dismiss. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed. The Supreme Court, in turn, granted review to consider how Section 11 pertains to statements of opinion, which the Court helpfully defined as a "sentiment" that does not "imply definiteness or . . . certainty," as contrasted with a "statement of fact," which "expresses certainty about a thing," is "determinate," and "verifiable."3


The Court's opinion in Omnicare hinges on the text of the statute. The Court explained that an investor may pursue a claim under Section 11 if a registration statement contains either (1) an "untrue statement of material fact"—what Omnicare calls the "false-statement provision"—or (2) "omits to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading"—what Omnicare calls the "omissions provision."4 Because Section 11 is a "strict liability statute," a plaintiff can recover damages under either of these provisions for proving falsity without having to prove that the defendant intended to defraud investors.

The Court squarely ruled that "a statement of opinion is not misleading just because external facts show the opinion to be incorrect," casting aside the ruling of the Sixth Circuit in the decision under review.5 More is required. Under Omnicare, liability for statements of opinion will arise under Section 11 in the following circumstances:

First, a statement of opinion is actionable under the false-statement provision of Section 11 if the statement is not sincerely believed. That is because a statement of opinion (an assertion like "we believe X") conveys the fact that the speakers actually hold the stated belief. If that is not actually the case, then the statement is false.6

Second, a statement of opinion is actionable under the false-statement provision of Section 11 if the opinion contains an "embedded statements of fact."7 For example: "We believe X because of Y fact." If Y is untrue, then there may be liability because the supporting fact supplied is untrue.

Finally, a statement of opinion is actionable under the omission provision even when it is literally accurate and sincerely held if the statement "omits material facts about the issuer's inquiry into or knowledge concerning a statement of opinion, and if those facts conflict with what a reasonable investor would take from the statement itself."client alert on the case, this third liability hook was pressed by the Solicitor General, who participated in the case as amicus on behalf of the United States, and is the aspect of the Omnicare decision that forges some new ground. 8 As previewed in our previous


Justice Kagan, writing for the Court, reasoned that opinion liability under the omissions clause makes sense: "a reasonable investor may, depending on the circumstances, understand an opinion statement to convey facts about how the speaker has formed the opinion—or, otherwise put, about the speaker's basis for holding that view. And if the real facts are otherwise, but not provided, the opinion statement will mislead its audience."9 Relying on common law tort principles, the Court's decision points out that "an expression of an opinion may carry with it an implied assertion, not only that the speaker knows no facts which would preclude such an opinion, but that he does know facts which justify it."10 That implied assertion, according to the Court, requires a speaker to have a reasonable basis for an expressed opinion (or an express disclosure that the opinion lacks a reasonable basis).

That is not to say that any undisclosed fact will trigger liability for a statement of opinion. An opinion statement "is not necessarily misleading when an issuer knows, but fails to disclose, some fact cutting the other way."11 That is so, the decision posits, given that "[r]easonable investors understand that opinions sometimes rest on a weighing of competing facts; indeed, the presence of such facts is one reason why an issuer may frame a statement as an opinion, thus conveying uncertainty."12 The Court went on to emphasize that a "reasonable investor does not expect that every fact known to an issuer supports its opinion statement."13

The Court brushed aside Omnicare's argument that companies will avoid expressing opinions because, according to Omnicare, "any inquiry into the issuer's basis for holding an opinion would be 'hopelessly amorphous,' threatening 'unpredictable' and 'possibly massive liability.'"14 For one thing, the scope of liability, the Court explained, reflects a "policy" decision that is better left to Congress, which extended omissions liability to "all statements"—not just statements of fact.15 And, in any event, "market-based forces push back against any inclination to underdisclose," the Court assured.16

The Court was also not persuaded that the floodgates would open to more shareholder lawsuits. Establishing liability for an opinion under the omissions theory will be "no small task for an investor," Justice Kagan wrote.17 An investor cannot come to court and "just say that an issuer failed to reveal its basis" for an opinion.18 Instead, an investor will have to "identify particular (and material) facts going to the basis for the issuer's opinion—facts about the inquiry the issuer did or did not conduct or the knowledge it did or did not have—whose omission makes the opinion at statement at issue misleading to a reasonable person reading the statement fairly and in context."19


The Court volunteered guidance on how to "avoid exposure for omissions" under Section 11.20 An issuer "need only divulge an opinion's basis, or else make clear the real tentativeness of its belief."21 That may be done by "including hedges, disclaimers, and apparently conflicting information" that could be taken into account by an investor.22 The decision thereby highlights the importance of "context" as providing the "broader frame" by which liability must be assessed by lower courts. That analytical approach echoes the "holistic" type of analysis that the Court has previously mandated in other recent securities cases.23

The Supreme Court remanded to the lower courts to consider whether Omnicare's statements of opinion were misleading, especially in light of context, including, among other factors, the status and expertise of the attorney who allegedly warned Omnicare about the risk of liability under the anti-kickback statutes, the disclaimers and other information that Omnicare disclosed about its legal compliance, and Omnicare's express cautions that the federal government had expressed significant concerns about some manufacturers' conduct.24 How the lower courts ultimately resolve these issues in the case may help define the limits or extent of liability for similar statements of opinion.


Although all of the Justices concurred in the judgment vacating the Sixth Court of Appeals ruling in favor of the plaintiffs, two wrote separate opinions. Justice Scalia would have limited liability to statements of opinion that were not sincerely held. The "objective test" adopted by the Court, Justice Scalia wrote, is "inconsistent with the common law and common intuitions about statements of opinion" and "invites roundabout attacks upon expressions of opinion."25 He added that the Court's decision "produces a far broader field of misrepresentation"26 that will invite more second guessing in hindsight by disgruntled investors. Justice Thomas filed a separate concurring opinion expressing his view that the Court should not have reached the omissions theory because it was not addressed by the lower courts.


The Omnicare decision will affect whether and how opinions are communicated in registration statements. It may also shape, to some extent, how courts approach liability even for statements alleged to be misleading where a material fact is omitted from other investor communications. That is because the statutory language at issue in Omnicare is similar to more than a dozen other federal securities laws provisions. One key difference, however, is that civil liability under other statutes like Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934—the federal securities statute most frequently invoked by private plaintiffs—requires proof of scienter, unlike Section 11. That means that, with respect to opinion statements made outside of registration statements, plaintiffs must show not only a material misstatement or omission, but also that a defendant did not believe his or her opinion and intended to deceive investors, a high hurdle for plaintiffs to overcome.

Going forward, public companies, their speakers, and the gatekeepers who advise them (including in-house and external counsel) should give special consideration to expressions of opinion that are communicated to the investing public. A prudent approach would be to accompany statements of opinion with the actual basis for the belief, the reasons for that belief, and qualifications of the opinion, including caveats or statements of tentativeness. In addition, documents supporting the basis for every statement of opinion should be verified, preserved, and readily accessible if litigation is filed. Indeed, doing so can significantly help bolster the defense of claims relating to all types of public statements, not just statements of opinion.

For better or worse, more disclosure may be the best defense to those who might "Monday morning quarterback an issuer's opinions," as the Court described, particularly with regard to "inherently subjective and uncertain assessments."27 Given that it is plaintiffs' lawyers who tend to play that role, redoubled diligence and caution in expressing various types of qualitative statements about a company's business may be the surest way for issuers and insiders to minimize the risk of securities liability going forward.


1 Slip op. at 20.

2 Id. at 3.

3 Id. at 6.

4 Id. at 2, 7, 10.

5 Id. at 11.

6 See id. at 6–8.

7 Id. at 8.

8 Id. at 12.

9 Id. at 11.

10 Id. at 15 (citations omitted).

11 Id. at 13.

12 Id.

13 Id.

14 Id. at 17.

15 Id.

16 Id. at 19.

17 Id. at 18.

18 Id.

19 Id.

20 Id. at 19.

21 Id.

22 Id. at 14.

23 See Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd., 551 U.S. 308 (2007).

24 Slip op. at 3.

25 Slip op. at 6 (Scalia, J., concurring).

26 Slip op. at 3 (Scalia, J., concurring).

27 Slip op. at 9.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions