United States:
Conflicting Views As To The Unfinished Business Doctrine
11 November 2015
Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
I, along with Tara McGuire, an associate here at Stoll Keenon
Ogden, have recently published in the Texas Journal of Business
Lawan article titled Conflicting Views as to the Unfinished
Business Doctrine. In this article we consider a pair of recent
decisions from New York and Colorado that come to opposite
conclusions as to the application of the Unfinished Business
Doctrine. We address as well the validity of the Doctrine as a
means of protecting partnership creditors, including retired
partners, and explain why the Doctrine does not raise ethical
issues as to the capacity of clients to select the attorney(s) of
their choice.
The article can be accessed
AT THIS LINK.
Originally published on
Kentucky Business Entity Law
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Corporate/Commercial Law from United States
ADA Compliance And Retail Websites
Klein Moynihan Turco LLP
For several years, consumers have flooded the Western District of Pennsylvania ("WDPA") with Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") compliance lawsuits, alleging that companies...
Chapter 3: Subcontractor Bonds
The Cromeens Law Firm
All they had to do before starting was to obtain a payment bond and a performance bond for the full amount of its subcontract. This was a requirement, so they did it. After they got...
Chapter 2: Subcontract Documents
The Cromeens Law Firm
The first rule about subcontracts is…there are no rules. Whatever you sign in a subcontract will be used against you.