Today, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in one case of interest to the business community:

Patents—Inter Partes Review

SAS Institute Inc. v. Lee, No. 16-96

The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act permits third parties to ask the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to reexamine claims in a patent that has already been issued—a process called "inter partes review."  Today, the Supreme Court agreed to decide whether, in conducting such a review, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board must "issue a final written decision as to every claim challenged by the petitioner," or whether it may "issue a final written decision with respect to the patentability of only some of the patent claims challenged by the petitioner."  In the proceedings below, SAS petitioned for inter partes review of 16 claims held by ComplementSoft.  The Board reviewed only four of the claims and issued a written decision as to those four.  The Federal Circuit held that this partial written decision was permissible.

Please visit us at

Visit us at

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

© Copyright 2017. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.