Today, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in two cases of interest to the business community:

Separation of Powers—Authority of Congress to Target Specific Lawsuits

Patchak v. Jewell,  No. 16-498

In Patchak v. Jewell, a landowner challenged the Secretary of the Interior's decision to take a nearby property into trust for the Gun Lake Tribe on the ground that the Secretary lacked the power to do so under the Indian Reorganization Act. The case went up to the Supreme Court, which held in 2012 that the plaintiff had standing to proceed with the lawsuit. In 2014, Congress enacted a statute that terminated plaintiff's lawsuit by requiring dismissal of any pending or future case relating to the property in question—without changing any generally applicable substantive or procedural law. The Supreme Court granted certiorari to decide whether in so doing Congress violated separation of powers principles and deprived the plaintiff of his right to due process under the Fifth Amendment.

Bankruptcy Code—Safe-Harbor Transfers to Financial Institutions

Merit Management Group, LP v. FTI Consulting, Inc., No. 16-784

Section 546(e) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 546(e), protects certain prepetition payouts by or to financial institutions from clawback by the trustee of the ensuing bankruptcy estate.  In particular, the safe harbor protects transfers made by a debtor by or to a broker, financial institution, or similar intermediary in connection with a "securities contract," unless the transfer was made with actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud creditors.

The majority of circuits have construed this provision broadly to preclude clawback actions, even if the broker or financial institution had only a minor role in the transaction—e.g., as a conduit.  The Seventh Circuit, in the decision below, held otherwise, finding that a trustee was entitled to pursue a constructive fraudulent transfer claim to avoid a debtor's purchase of the stock of a competing harness-racing company.  In another petition pending before the Court, the Second Circuit adopted the majority position, holding that a creditors' committee could not pursue a constructive fraudulent transfer claim against shareholders of The Tribune Company, in an attempt to claw back billions of dollars they received in a leveraged buyout before the company filed for bankruptcy.

Please visit us at

Visit us at

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

© Copyright 2017. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.