Today, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in one case of interest to the business community:

Administrative Procedure Act – Finality of Approved Jurisdictional Determinations Over Wetlands and Bodies of Water

United States Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes Co., Inc., No. 15-290

The Administrative Procedure Act permits judicial review of a "final agency action for which there is no other adequate remedy in a court." Landowners may ask the Army Corps of Engineers to issue an "approved jurisdictional determination" whether the Corps has regulatory jurisdiction over a particular wetland or body of water. If the Corps determines that it has jurisdiction, the landowner must obtain a permit from the Corps pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act or risk civil and criminal penalties for discharging materials into the water without a permit. The Corps found that it had jurisdiction over wetland that Hawkes wishes to mine for peat. Hawkes sought judicial review of that decision under the APA. The district court found that it lacked jurisdiction to review the Corps's determination because it was not a "final agency action." But the Eighth Circuit disagreed with the district court and with a prior decision of the Fifth Circuit. It held that an approved jurisdictional determination was analogous to the compliance order that the Supreme Court held was final in Sacket v. EPA, finding that Hawkes's options of a futile application for a Section 404 permit or mining without a permit were plainly inadequate remedies. The Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve the disagreement between the circuits and determine whether the Corps's approved jurisdictional determination is a final agency action subject to immediate judicial review under the APA.

Please visit us at

Visit us at

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

© Copyright 2015. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.