United States:
SCOTUS Case With Implications For Attorney-Client Privilege Between CIPOs And C-Suite
24 January 2023
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
Head of Life Sciences Irena Royzman and Litigation associate
Mark H. Russell authored an IAM article titled "SCOTUS Case
With Implications for Attorney-Client Privilege Between CIPOs and
C-Suite" on Jan. 20, 2023. The article examines how the U.S.
Supreme Court may broaden confidentiality of communications
containing dual-purpose legal and business advice.
SCOTUS Case With Implications For Attorney-Client Privilege Between
CIPOs And C-Suite
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Intellectual Property from United States
Are Your NDAs Up To Date?
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
Nondisclosure agreements (NDAs) can be used to protect companies' confi dential and trade secret information. But you should resist the urge to have a vendor...
Legal Implications Of New York Times vs. OpenAI
BoyarMiller
The New York Times recently filed a landmark lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft, accusing them of copyright infringement in the training of the chatbot ChatGPT which launched just over a year ago.
