As you may remember, there were a lot of changes to the U.S. tax law at the end of December 2017. Those changes were enacted by the so-called Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. One of those changes was the addition of Internal Revenue Code section 451(b). This rule requires accrual method taxpayers who file "applicable financial statements" to recognize certain items of income for federal income tax purposes no later than when they recognize such income on those financial statements.

Section 451(b) could affect the timing of a sponsor's tax recognition of certain of its revenue (e.g., credit card late fees), and could affect the timing of a noteholder's tax recognition of income items from an investment in a note (e.g., discount). It is not uncommon to see securitization offering documents contain some tax disclosure regarding this new rule. On September 5, 2019, the IRS issued proposed regulations providing guidance on the application of these rules.

The proposed regulations address a variety of matters, including certain items of income relating to debt instruments. The proposed regulations clarify that Internal Revenue Code section 451(b) does not apply where special methods of accounting are used for federal income tax purposes, including hedging transactions, mark-to-market accounting and REMIC inducement fees. According to the proposed regulations, included in the special methods of accounting for which Internal Revenue Code section 451(b) will not require acceleration of income inclusion on the basis of a financial statement are the general special tax accounting rules for debt instruments such as original issue discount, de minimis original issue discount, market discount, de minimis market discount, contingent payment debt instruments and variable rate debt instruments. However, the proposed regulations provide that certain payments to a lender that are otherwise not treated as "fees" for federal income tax purposes but instead are treated as amounts that reduce the debt instrument's issue price and are recovered as income over time, must be included as income of the lender in the year of receipt if those payments are treated as fees on the lender's applicable financial statement.

We expect future securitization disclosure to be updated to reflect the recent proposed regulations. For more information, see our Legal Update, which summarizes how these rules impact affected taxpayers.

The post Proposed tax regulations to new income acceleration rule address debt instruments appeared first on Retained Interest.

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

© Copyright 2019. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.