Many businesses have stretched the definition of "marketing" to claim some questionable federal income tax deductions related to their boating hobby. A recent case involving a real estate developer illustrates how the IRS — and the U.S. Tax Court — generally see through these tactics.
Developer angles for a deduction
The court described the taxpayer in the case as a "serial entrepreneur." His portfolio of businesses included several real estate developments and a beach amenities company in Florida.
In 2005, he paid about $2 million for a 67-foot fishing yacht. For the three years at issue, the taxpayer took the boat to several regional fishing tournaments, but it otherwise seldom left the dock. Nonetheless, he claimed yacht-related deductions on the tax returns for the beach amenities business of around $394,000, $127,000 and $113,000.
The IRS disallowed the deductions. It found, among other things, that the yacht expenses were not ordinary and necessary business purposes. The taxpayer appealed.
Court throws deductions overboard
The taxpayer contended that the yacht was a marketing tool for his real property businesses. Specifically, he claimed to get wealthy anglers on board at tournaments and entertain them. Though he had sales packets on board, there was no signage on the yacht advertising his resorts and no visitors' log.
The court was not swayed by this argument. It distinguished between entertainment activities, which might have been deductible if directly related to the taxpayer's business, and entertainment facilities, for which no deduction was allowable. (Note that the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act amended the applicable tax law to make all business entertainment expenses generally nondeductible.)
The taxpayer's expenses, the court found, were for entertainment activities. It acknowledged that some anglers he met at tournaments later bought condos, but said "just because an activity generates some business doesn't mean it can't be entertainment" for tax purposes. The taxpayer was not a professional fisherman or even in the boat business. Thus, the tournaments were merely entertainment activities for him and his company.
Because the court also found the yacht was an entertainment facility, it normally would have proceeded to determine which of the deductions were entertainment activity expenses and which were entertainment facility expenses. But, it did not bother because the taxpayer had provided no credible evidence of a direct relationship between the expenses and the "active conduct" of any of his businesses, "especially the beach amenities business." And, he had failed to adequately substantiate the expenses.
As a result of the disallowed deductions, the taxpayer faced additional taxes. Moreover, he avoided steep accuracy-related penalties only because the IRS made a technical error.
So what could he have done?
As a boater myself who represents many marina operators, I am asked this question all the time.
Since the taxpayer did own a "beach amenities" company, he could have used the boat for signage advertising the amenities business. (Here in Chicago, there is a sailboat with Miller Lite sails; I am sure the owner of the boat is paid for advertising by the company and deductsthe costs associated with the vessel.)
He could have offered the boat for charter and advertised the charter through his other businesses. If the boat were used more than 50% in business activities, he could have allocated the cost of maintaining the boat between deductible and nondeductible expenses.
As this article points out, contemporaneously maintaining a log of usage, much like keeping an auto mileage log for a car, would go a long way to proving the business usage of the vessel.
Your tax advisor can help you claim — and properly substantiate — business deductions that can withstand IRS scrutiny.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.