United States:
Josh Goldberg, Cory Bell, And Kevin Rodkey On The Supreme Court's Decision In SAS Institute v. Iancu
04 May 2018
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
In SAS Institute v. Iancu, the Supreme Court addressed the
question of, "[w]hen the Patent Office initiates an inter
partes review, must it resolve all of the claims in the case, or
may it choose to limit its review to only some of them?" The
Court found that, contrary to the prior USPTO practice, the Board
may not limit institution to only some of the challenged claims.
Finnegan attorneys Joshua Goldberg, Kevin Rodkey, and Cory Bell
join us now to discuss what happens now.
To listen to the podcast click
here.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Intellectual Property from United States
USPTO Embraces AI Tools In New Guidance
Crowell & Moring LLP
On April 11, 2024, the USPTO published its "Guidance on Use of Artificial Intelligence-Based Tools in Practice Before the United States" in the Federal Register (the "Guidance"). As the title suggests...
Breaking Down The EPO's Revised Practice Guidelines
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
The guidelines for examination in the European Patent Office instruct on the practice and procedure related to the examination of European patent applications...
USPTO Issues Guidance On Use Of AI-Based Tools
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
On April 11, 2024, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued Guidance on Use of Artificial-Intelligence-Based Tools (Guidance), which applies existing rules and policies...