United States:
Hedonic Regression — The Theory Behind The $2.2B Verdict In The VLSI Technologies v. Intel Case
06 April 2021
Winston & Strawn LLP
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
Listen to Audio
Winston's Michael Tomasulo and economist and damages expert
Dr. Alan Cox unpack VLSI's use of hedonic regression, which was
used to support its $2.2B damages claim in the VLSI v.
Intel patent jury trial. Michael Tomasulo and Dr. Cox review
hedonic regressions, discuss how they have been used in antitrust
cases, how VLSI used them to determine patent damages, and how the
verdict might be attacked by Intel.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Intellectual Property from United States
Are Your NDAs Up To Date?
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
Nondisclosure agreements (NDAs) can be used to protect companies' confi dential and trade secret information. But you should resist the urge to have a vendor...
Legal Implications Of New York Times vs. OpenAI
BoyarMiller
The New York Times recently filed a landmark lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft, accusing them of copyright infringement in the training of the chatbot ChatGPT which launched just over a year ago.
