On July 10, 2018, the Office of the US Trade Representative ("USTR") announced a list of additional products imported from China that potentially could be subject to a 10 percent tariff after a notice and comment period. (See our July 11, 2018 Legal Update, " US Announces Additional Section 301 Tariffs After China's Retaliatory Moves on US Products"). On August 1, USTR Robert Lighthizer issued a statement that his agency, under President Trump's direction, is considering increasing the level of the proposed tariff from 10 percent to 25 percent.  The comment period on this action has been extended from August 30 to September 6, accordingly.1

On August 3, in response to this latest US action, China announced four lists of US-origin products imported into China that would be subject to varying levels of new tariffs. The new Chinese tariffs would affect a wide range of US products spread across nearly all chapters of the harmonized tariff schedule (5,207 tariff lines) and valued at approximately $60 billion. Examples of these affected products include chemicals, agricultural products, small- and medium-size airplanes and auto parts.2

Unlike the US action proposing a single tariff rate, China opted to adopt four different levels of increased tariffs—that is, 25 percent, 20 percent, 10 percent and 5 percent. Specifically, the first Chinese list consists of 2,493 tariff lines for which US-origin products will be subject to an additional duty of 25 percent.3 The second Chinese list consists of 1,078 tariff lines for which US-origin products will be subject to an additional duty of 20 percent.4 The third Chinese list consists of 974 tariff lines for which US-origin products will be subject to an additional duty of 10 percent.5 The fourth Chinese list consists of 662 tariff lines for which US-origin products will be subject to an additional duty of 5 percent.6 The official notice, in Chinese, also states that "reductions and exemptions will not apply to tariffs imposed this time."7 The effective date for the new tariffs will be announced in a separate notice, depending on US actions.8

In announcing the new tariffs, China again criticized the US action as "departing from common understandings reached during multiple negotiations, causing the Sino-US trade dispute to escalate, seriously violating relevant WTO rules, and infringing China and Chinese people's interests."9 It further explained that its countermeasure adopting different tariff levels is "reasonable" and "constrained,"10 after taking into account the impact on companies and the global supply chain.11 It is doubtful, though, that the Trump administration will view China's retaliation as such.   




3 Chinese August 3 Product List 1, 

4 Chinese August 3 Product List 2, http://gss.mof.gov.cn/zhengwuxinxi/zhengcefabu/201808/P020180803711628507212.pdf.

5 Chinese August 3 Product List 3, http://gss.mof.gov.cn/zhengwuxinxi/zhengcefabu/201808/P020180803711628844240.pdf.

6 Chinese August 3 Product List 4, http://gss.mof.gov.cn/zhengwuxinxi/zhengcefabu/201808/P020180803711629144210.pdf.




10 Id.

11 Id.

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

© Copyright 2018. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.