United States:
What Kinds Of Insurance Cases Did The Supreme Court Decide (Part 2 – 2005-2019)?
05 October 2020
Arnold & Porter
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
Between 2005 and 2019, the Supreme Court decided only 29
insurance cases – far fewer than in our first 15 years.
Fourteen of those cases involved coverage questions (although four
of those fourteen fell in a single year – 2005). Three
involved insurer torts, four dealt with exclusions, only two
addressed defenses, three related to regulatory issues and three
fell into our catch-all category of "other" (mostly
procedural issues which typically arise in insurance cases).
Join us back here next week as we turn our attention to a new
issue.
Image courtesy of Flickr by Alex Beattie (no changes).
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Insurance from United States
D&O Insurance Myths (Part 2) (Video)
Lowenstein Sandler
Last month we discussed the importance of Directors and Officers (D&O) insurance and set the record straight on some common misconceptions about it.
Faulty Workmanship Coverage Update
Plunkett & Cooney
The Washington Supreme Court affirmed the Washington Court of Appeals ruling that coverage for repairs to the Gardens Condominium's roof components was available under the resulting loss exception to the insurance policy's faulty workmanship exclusion.
Priority Of Coverage: Debunking "Other Insurance" Myths
Lowenstein Sandler
Today on "Don't Take No For An Answer," host Lynda A. Bennett is joined by Alexander B. Corson for a discussion about priority of coverage, or who pays what when there are numerous claims, parties, and policies at play.