The Supreme Court issued a long-awaited ruling on April 27, 2020, directed at a more than $12 billion challenge related to the temporary risk corridors program established by the Affordable Care Act (the "ACA"). Challenges were brought under multiple consolidated cases, Maine Community Health Options v. United States, Moda Health Plan v. United States, Land of Lincoln Mutual Health v. United States, and Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina v. United States (the "Consolidated Cases"). In its decision, the Court reversed the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and remanded the case for further proceedings.
Background
Section 1342 of the ACA provided for a temporary risk corridors program to encourage insurers to participate on the health care exchanges created by the ACA. The risk corridors program was in effect from 2014 through 2016. Under the program, the government was required to make payments to insurers that incurred losses on their exchange plans and to receive payments from insurers that made money on their exchange products. These payments were to be determined in accordance with the formula established under Section 1342.
The ACA did not explicitly designate how the risk corridor payments were to be funded; it simply provided that the insurers "shall be paid." In its 2015-2017 appropriations for the Department of Health and Human Services ("HHS"), which administered the risk corridor program, the Republican controlled Congress blocked the risk corridor payments by including a rider preventing HHS from using its appropriated funds to make the risk corridor payments owed to insurers. Insurers brought suit.
The Decision
In a resounding 8-1 decision for the insurers written by Justice Sotomayor, the Supreme Court confirmed the government had an obligation, or as Justice Sotomayor put it "a legal duty...that could mature into a legal liability through the insurers'...participa[tion] in the healthcare exchanges," to pay insurers the full amount required by Section 1342. The Court also unequivocally stated that payment under the risk corridors program was "neither contingent on nor limited by the availability" of any funds – defeating any argument the government had made regarding the payments being impliedly conditioned on the availability of proper appropriations.
This is a major victory for insurers and bodes well for a favorable ruling on pending challenges to the government reneging on its obligation to pay insurers for cost-sharing amounts. It will not have any bearing on the fundamental challenge to the ACA's constitutionality.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
