Recently, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled that employees had no claim for invasion of privacy when a drug-testing facility "directly observed" them as they provided a urine sample. Proskauer's Anthony Oncidi joins Bloomberg Law podcast host June Grasso to discuss the ruling's significance and what it means for employers.

Listen to the podcast here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.