In its recent  white paper, “Climate Change Disclosure Report: From Omission to Commission,” Intelligize revisits the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) climate change-related disclosure guidance. The report notes that the SEC only has provided guidance twice, first in 2010 and again in 2021. The report expresses that the SEC's 2010 interpretive guidance addressing companies' climate change disclosure was exactly that: guidance. Yet, the report states that this twelve-year-old guidance has “proved durable.”

It was not until 2021 that the topic of climate change disclosure was revisited by the SEC (see our  related post). The white paper looks at SEC Staff comment letters related to climate change disclosures that were issued after 2010, and also covers comment letters issued following the SEC Staff's  2021 sample letter, as well.

The report finds three instances where SEC Staff comments were dedicated to climate change risk factor disclosures; two from 2010 (for different companies) and one from 2021. Both 2010 SEC comments were in reference to “lack of disclosure…related to climate change,” where the SEC Staff requested more specific discussion regarding the impacts that the company would face from climate change. Years later, in its 2021 comment to a third company, the SEC Staff requested they “address the negative impact… [and] include potential regulatory and legislative risk…” with respect to climate change.

The report looks at comments issued on the MD&A section and goes through the Staff guidance regarding the Regulation S-K framework for MD&A disclosure. There are few comment letters referencing climate-related subjects in MD&A; the report cites only a handful, and states, “If the SEC had issued more comment letters on climate disclosure over the last decade, we might have a more definite sense of whether it expects issuers to address those topics in the MD&A section or elsewhere.”

Finally, the report reviews comment letters relating to disclosure in the general section, identifying comment letters to three relatively high-profile issuers regarding claims of carbon neutrality where the Staff questioned the issuers to “justify or remove positive statements made about their own environmental record.”

With more attention focused on climate change every day, companies have been more inclined to include disclosures related to this—however, comment letters offer little guidance.

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

© Copyright 2020. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.