CONTRIBUTOR
ARTICLE
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced that he filed a lawsuit against five of the world's largest oil and gas companies, as well as the American Petroleum Institute, alleging that they misled consumers about the impact that the use of fossil fuels will have on the planet.

In announcing the lawsuit, Bonta said, "Oil and gas companies have privately known the truth for decades — that the burning of fossil fuels leads to climate change — but have fed us lies and mistruths to further their record-breaking profits at the expense of our environment."

The complaint, which runs more than 130 pages, alleges a variety of claims, including public nuisance, damage to natural resources, false advertising, misleading environmental marketing, unfair, unlawful, and fraudulent business practices, and products liability.

The essence of the AG's complaint is that, even though fossil fuel companies knew about the environmental harms associated with the use of fossil fuels, they "mounted a disinformation campaign beginning at least as early as the 1970s to discredit the burgeoning scientific consensus on climate change; deny their own knowledge of climate change related threats; create doubt in the minds of consumers, the media, teachers, policymakers, and the public about the reality and consequences of the impacts of burning fossil fuels; and delay the necessary transition to a lower-carbon future."

California joins a number of other jurisdictions alleging similar claims. We'll be closing watching these lawsuits as they develop. Not only could they have significant impact on the fossil fuel companies, of course, but these cases could also provide further guidance to marketers generally about the extent to which they are responsible for larger societal harms that could result in connection with the use of their products.

www.fkks.com

This alert provides general coverage of its subject area. We provide it with the understanding that Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz is not engaged herein in rendering legal advice, and shall not be liable for any damages resulting from any error, inaccuracy, or omission. Our attorneys practice law only in jurisdictions in which they are properly authorized to do so. We do not seek to represent clients in other jurisdictions.

AUTHOR(S)
Jeff Greenbaum
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Environment from United States
Cascading Effects Of EPA's New PFAS MCLs For Drinking Water
Exponent
First national PFAS regulation increases potential liability for water utilities, wastewater facilities, and industrial dischargers...
EPA Has Now Listed Two PFAS As Hazardous Substances Under CERCLA. Hold Onto Your Hats
Mintz
Less than ten days after setting drinking water standards for six of the hundreds of chemicals known collectively as PFAS, EPA has now identified two of those PFAS that have been widely used for decades, PFOA and PFOS, as hazardous substances under CERCLA.
EPA Issues New Civil And Criminal Environmental Enforcement Policy
Winston & Strawn LLP
On April 17, 2024, the Assistant Administrator for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance (OECA) issued a new Strategic Civil-Criminal Enforcement Policy.
California Lists BPS On Prop 65
Exponent
On Dec. 29, the California Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) formally added bisphenol S (BPS) as a reproductive toxicant under the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, commonly known as Prop 65.
PFAS Phase-out Bill Introduced In United States Congress
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis once opined that ​"a single courageous State may, if its citizens choose, serve as a laboratory; and try novel social and economic experiments.
CERCLA Designation Of PFOA And PFOS: Impact On Passive Receivers And The Renewed Debate On Defining PFAS
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
Last week, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized its rule designating perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) as hazardous substances under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act.
FREE News Alerts
Sign Up for our free News Alerts - All the latest articles on your chosen topics condensed into a free bi-weekly email.
Curated Content
Upcoming Events
Mondaq Social Media