Torres v. The Wendy's Co., No. 6:16-cv-00210 (M.D. Fla. July 15, 2016)

The court dismissed, without prejudice, a proposed class action over a January data breach at Wendy's, finding that allegations of two fraudulent charges allegedly made to representative plaintiff's debit card were insufficient to establish Article III standing. In dismissing the case with leave to replead, the court found that the harm plaintiff alleged was "highly speculative." Applying the standard from the Eleventh Circuit's 2012 decision in Resnick v. AvMed, the court noted that even assuming that plaintiff's two fraudulent charges would constitute actual identity theft, plaintiff had not alleged any monetary harm stemming from the two fraudulent charges, including that the two fraudulent charges were unreimbursed by his credit union. View the decision.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.