Keywords: Second Circuit, securities, Supreme Court
A few months ago, I posted about a Second Circuit decision that threatens to open the floodgates to securities class actions, NECA-IBEW Health & Welfare Fund v. Goldman Sachs & Co., 693 F.3d 145 (2d Cir. 2012).In that decision, the Second Circuit ruled that even though a plaintiff in an individual action may assert securities claims only as to securities that it purchased, a plaintiff may bring a class action involving securities that it did not purchase.According to the Second Circuit, a plaintiff has "class standing" to bring such claims if it purchased at least one of the securities at issue in the lawsuit and all of the class claims raise a sufficiently similar set of concerns.In October, Goldman Sachs filed a petition for certiorari seeking review of the Second Circuit's decision.And last week, my colleagues and I submitted an amicus brief (pdf) on behalf of DRI-The Voice of the Defense Bar in support of Goldman's petition.Our brief argues that the Second Circuit's ruling contradicts Supreme Court precedent saying that a class action adds nothing to the standing inquiry and that statutory limitations on standing cannot be ignored.We also explain why the Second Circuit's "class standing" ruling will encourage burdensome and abusive class actions in securities and other cases.
Originally published December 12, 2012
Visit us at mayerbrown.com
Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.
© Copyright 2012. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.
This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.