Fried Frank's International Arbitration Group is pleased to keep you posted on significant developments in international arbitration. With this edition of the International Arbitration Newsletter", we provide an analysis of selected recent events as well as brief updates from around the world.
Articles in this issue include:
- The Singapore High Court Enforces Pathological Clause
- New AAA Rules Allow Parties to Subject Arbitral Awards to Broad Appellate Review
- Challenging the Validity and Enforceability of Arbitral Awards
is a Risky Endeavor:
US Courts Warn That Parties Risk Costs and Sanctions - The UK High Court Rejects a Challenge Against an Arbitral Award
as an
Impermissible Attempt to Go Behind the Tribunal's Fact Finding - Unsuccessful Application to Set Aside Arbitral Award Attracts
Indemnity
Costs in Hong Kong - Russian Federation Clarifies When Public Policy is a Ground for
Challenging
Foreign Arbitral Awards in Russian Courts - The "Dallah Principle" Prevails in England: A Party
Who Takes No Part in Arbitral
Proceedings Can Challenge Tribunal's Jurisdiction at the Enforcement Stage - Availability of Class Arbitration: US Supreme Court Weighs In
- India Continues in the Direction of a More Arbitration Friendly
Stance by
Restricting the Scope of Public Policy Challenges to Foreign Awards
Click here to view the Fried Frank International Arbitration Newsletter".
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
