Today, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in the following cases of interest to the business community:

Immigration Law—Validity of Executive Orders Limiting Entry of Foreign Nationals

Trump v. Int'l Refugee Assistance Project, No. 16-1436
Trump v. Hawaii, No. 16-1540

Executive Order No. 13780 suspends the entry of nationals from six foreign countries for a 90-day period. A variety of lawsuits have been filed to challenge whether the Executive Order violates the First Amendment's Establishment Clause (by targeting predominantly Muslim nations) or the Immigration and Nationality Act. To date, two federal courts of appeals have approved injunctions staying the enforcement of the Executive Order.

Today, the Supreme Court granted certiorari and modified the injunctions. In particular, the Court limited the stay of the entry prohibitions to foreign nationals who claim a bona fide relationship with a United States person (e.g., a close relative)or an institution (e.g., a university or an employer). The Administrative may therefore begin to enforce the Executive Order as against those individuals lacking such a relationship. Justices Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch indicated that they would have dissolved the injunctions entirely.

These consolidated actions will be set for oral argument when the Court returns from its summer recess in October.

First Amendment—Applicability to Public Accommodations Laws

Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, No. 16-111

Colorado's Anti-Discrimination Act prohibits businesses that sell goods to the public from discriminating based on sexual orientation. Today, the Supreme Court granted certiorari to decide whether application of that act to a Christian baker who refused to make a cake for a same-sex couple's wedding violates the Free Speech or Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment. This case has been closely watched and will be expected to generate considerable attention when it is argued and decided next Term.

Dodd-Frank Act—Reach of "Whistleblower" Provision

Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. Somers, No. 16-1276

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 prohibits retaliation against "whistleblowers" who "mak[e] disclosures that are required or protected under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002" and other securities laws. The Dodd-Frank Act defines a "whistleblower" as an "individual who provides ... information relating to a violation of the securities laws to the [Securities and Exchange] Commission." Today, the Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve a split among the courts of appeals as to whether the Dodd-Frank Act's anti-retaliation provision applies to individuals who have not reported alleged misconduct to the Securities and Exchange Commission but have filed internal reports under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act or other securities laws.

Visit us at

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

© Copyright 2017. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.