Over the past year, proxy advisory firms, major index providers, and the SEC's Investor Advisory Committee have weighed in on the growing number of companies with dual-share classes. Today, 9% of the S&P 100 and 8% of the Russell 300 are comprised of companies with dual-class structures. The Council of Institutional Investors has assembled and published a list of public companies with dual-class structures. During a recent program hosted at the Weinberg Center, titled "Snap Judgment: The Legal and Investment Issues Associated with Non-Voting Stock," participants debated whether courts should step in and consider dual-class structures.
Traditionally, courts will defer to the business decisions of a company with independent directors that act in good faith having undertaken reasonable care. However, some participants noted that the business judgment rule has been premised on the notion that stockholders could remove a board with which they disagreed. In instances in which stockholders cannot hold boards of directors accountable by exercising voting rights, participants argued that it might be appropriate for courts to take on greater responsibility for shareholder protection through more active intervention. Of course, it could be argued that stockholders could simply sell their securities.
Visit us at mayerbrown.com
Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.
© Copyright 2018. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.
This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.