Keywords: US commodity futures trading commission, FAQs, CPOs, CTAs, CFTC, non-derivatives

On August 14, 2012, the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission's (CFTC) Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight released a set of frequently asked questions and answers regarding the changes to registration and compliance requirements for commodity pool operators (CPOs) and commodity trading advisors (CTAs) adopted earlier this year. Although the FAQs still leave a number of questions unanswered for certain market participants, they do address the following points, among others:

  • A fund that predominantly invests in non-derivatives and that seeks to manage risk through de minimis swap positions is not prevented from claiming exemption under CFTC Regulation 4.13(a)(3) even if its first position is a swap that technically causes such fund to exceed the threshold limits under Regulation 4.13(a)(3). A CPO should have a "reasonable time" to comply with the trading thresholds. The CFTC Staff declined to define what a "reasonable time" would mean, but noted that a "reasonable time" may vary depending upon the facts and circumstances of each CPO and pool.
  • The CFTC Staff confirmed that, although Regulation 4.13(a)(3) requires that the trading limits be complied with "at all times," measurement of compliance need occur only at the time a commodities position is established. Thus, a CPO need not reconfigure its portfolio to comply with such limits solely in response to market movements that change the composition of its portfolio and technical adherence to the stated trading limits.
  • The notional value for cleared and uncleared swaps is the amount reported by the reporting counterparty of the swap under Part 45 of the CFTC's regulations.
  • CPOs that wish to transition from being exempt under CFTC Regulation 4.13(a)(4) to being exempt under Regulation 4.13(a)(3) must first submit a written request to the National Futures Association (NFA) to withdraw the exemption under Regulation 4.13(a)(4). The NFA will then contact the CPO when the exemption has been withdrawn. The CPO may file the new exemption after the withdrawal is finalized and must provide notice to participants of the change of exemption.
  • CPOs of funds-of-funds may continue to rely on Appendix A until the CFTC adopts revised guidance.

Previously published on August 22, 2012.

Learn more about our Corporate & Securities, Derivatives and Structured Products, Private Investment Funds and Financial Services Regulatory & Enforcement practices.

Visit us at

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

© Copyright 2012. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.