To address issues related to their proposed merger, T-Mobile and Sprint agreed to settle an antitrust case brought by the DOJ and Attorneys General for five states.

T-Mobile and Sprint agreed to a substantial divestiture package to (i) ensure that a viable facilities-based competitor can enter the market and (ii) establish multiple high-quality 5G networks that benefit American consumers and entrepreneurs. In accordance with the divestiture package, Sprint and T-Mobile must divest Sprint's prepaid businesses, including Boost Mobile, Virgin Mobile and Sprint prepaid, to Dish Network Corp. In addition, "20,000 cell sites and hundreds of retail locations" must be made available to Dish by T-Mobile and Sprint.

The DOJ and the State Attorneys General claimed that the divestiture maintains competition between "two of only four facilities-based suppliers" of nationwide mobile wireless services. In the Complaint, the DOJ noted that the merger between T-Mobile and Sprint threatens the benefits customers have realized through lower pricing and better services by eliminating "head-to-head" competition.

Comments must be submitted within 60 days of publication of the proposed consent decree and DOJ competitive impact statement in the Federal Register.

Commentary Joel Mitnick

The settlement raises unique procedural issues and important substantive ones. Procedurally, the DOJ and five states with Republican governors filed their complaint and consent decree in the District Court for the District of Columbia. The pending action by nine other State AGs with Democratic governors and the AG for the District of Columbia, which has a Democratic mayor, was filed in the Southern District of New York. In this unprecedented duel of enforcement lawsuits, presumably the District Court will review the DOJ/States-proposed settlement in a Tunney Act review while the other States' challenge proceeds in New York. What effect, if any, will either Court's rulings have on the other, and will the States in the New York proceeding move to consolidate both cases before the same Court in New York?

Substantively, the parties in each proceeding will have to address questions about whether the proposed merger is anticompetitive, whether the proposed divestiture to Dish solves the competitive problems, if any, and whether Sprint/T-Mobile can establish an efficiency defense that the merger is necessary for them to be meaningful competitors to AT&T and Verizon in the development of emerging 5G technology.

The proposed DOJ settlement leaves open many questions and a lot of moving parts that will continue to unfold in the coming months.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.