CONTRIBUTOR
ARTICLE
This Article is waiting for corrections.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration from Australia
Justice Lee's judgment a reminder to the profession of the importance of the Harman undertaking in all areas of litigation
Carroll & O'Dea
Anyone engaging in court proceedings should be aware of the Harman undertaking & its applicability to documents in proceedings.
Why can't I serve a subpoena on Centrelink and the Australian Taxation Office?
Carroll & O'Dea
While subpoenas are a good tool to direct the production of documents, there are limits on the power of a subpoena.
Our opinion on the Bruce Lehrmann defamation case
O'Brien Criminal & Civil Solicitors
Defamation proceedings may result in the further destruction of the reputations that they are attempting to salvage.
Case summary – Legal professional privilege - Ghorbanzadeh v Western Sydney Local Health District [2023] NSWSC 1330
Carroll & O'Dea
Written material by an expert in preparation for a verbal opinion may need to be disclosed in subsequent court proceedings.
NSW Supreme Court ruling highlights difficulty in relying on limitations defence
Holman Webb
An example of how difficult it can be to successfully rely on a limitations defence, particularly at an interlocutory stage.
Defence of justification (truth) in defamation in Australia
Stonegate Legal
The defence of justification has shifted towards a requirement that the imputations are "substantially true".
FREE News Alerts
Sign Up for our free News Alerts - All the latest articles on your chosen topics condensed into a free bi-weekly email.
Upcoming Events
Mondaq Social Media