Bermuda: Overcoming Majority Rule: The Minority Oppression Remedy In Bermuda

Last Updated: 27 July 2018
Article by Kevin Taylor, Benjamin McCosker, Nicole Tovey and Kai Musson

The notion of majority rule is the basis on which almost all corporate affairs proceed. This concept reflects the doctrine of corporate democracy and was heartily endorsed by Sir James Wigram VC in Foss v Harbottle,1 which itself can be traced to certain early-nineteenth-century English decisions on the law of partnership.

But there is an inherent tension between majority rule and the protection of fundamental minority rights. This is particularly the case in closely held companies where the majority shareholders might also (directly or through their nominees) control the board. What recourse is available to minority shareholders who have been oppressed by the majority?

As one of the exceptions to the rule in Foss v Harbottle, the minority oppression remedy is one of the few avenues of recourse available to minority shareholders of companies domiciled in Bermuda when the conduct of the majority is oppressive or prejudicial to the interests of the minority or any one of them. This advisory examines the scope of the minority oppression remedy and the circumstances in which relief may be granted to a minority petitioner under Bermuda law.

Statutory basis for the minority oppression remedy

The statutory remedy against minority shareholder oppression is set out in section 111 of the Bermuda Companies Act 1981 (the "Act"), which substantively replicates section 210 of the English Companies Act 1948.2 In a 2004 decision of the New Zealand Court of Appeal, which has been cited with approval by the Bermuda Supreme Court,3 the historical underpinnings of the remedy were described in the following terms:4

"The oppression remedy originated in Britain in s210 of the Companies Act 1948 (UK), as an alternative to winding up on the just and equitable ground. The argument was that winding up was much too drastic a remedy to utilise in many cases, and that it would be desirable to give courts wider powers to intervene to set matters to right, whether by ordering one party to buy the other out or otherwise regulating the affairs of a company".

Pursuant to section 111 of the Act, the following elements must be established for a petitioner to succeed in an application for relief:

  1. that the affairs of the company are being conducted in a manner oppressive or prejudicial to the minority or to any one of them; and
  2. that the Court would be prepared to make a winding-up order on the 'just and equitable' ground; but
  3. that such winding-up would unfairly prejudice those members.

This second qualification is an important one and sets a high bar for relief to be granted. Thus, as Ground CJ stated in DE Shaw Oculus Portfolios LLC v Orient-Express Hotels Ltd:5

"In order to achieve relief under section 111 of the Act the petitioners have to show that, were it not for the existence of the statutory remedy, it would otherwise be just and equitable to wind up the company".

Once these elements have been established, the Court in determining the petition may "with a view to bringing to an end the matters complained of, make such order as it thinks fit, whether for regulating the conduct of the company's affairs in future, or for the purchase of the shares of any members of the company by other members of the company...".6 The usual order sought by a petitioner is for its shares to be purchased by the majority for fair value,7 and the Court will typically endorse this approach in furtherance of achieving a 'clean break' between the parties.8

What constitutes oppression?

Section 111 of the Act requires that the conduct complained of must be "oppressive or prejudicial".

The meaning of the term "oppressive" was considered by the House of Lords in Scottish Co-operative Wholesale Society v Meyer, in which Simonds VC took it to describe circumstances in which a majority power exercises its authority in a manner "burdensome, harsh and wrongful".9 Plowman J, in the 1965 decision In re Lundie Brothers Ltd has held that a minority shareholder complaining of oppressive conduct must also establish "lack of probity or fair dealing to him in that capacity".10

As to the meaning of the term "prejudicial", the Bermuda Supreme Court has drawn parallels with the 'unfair prejudice' doctrine in the current English statute, citing with approval the deliberately imprecise definition proposed by Lord Hoffman in O'Neill v Phillips:11

"The concept of fairness must be applied judicially and the context which it is given by the courts must be based upon rational principles... Although fairness is a notion which can be applied to all kinds of activities its content will depend upon the context in which it is being used".

When will the Court grant relief?

The minority oppression remedy is commonly referred to as the 'alternative remedy' for an aggrieved minority shareholder, the primary remedy being an application for the winding-up of the subject company on the just and equitable ground pursuant to section 161(g) of the Act. For this reason, there has been somewhat limited judicial consideration of the minority oppression remedy by the Bermuda courts, and few instances in which the remedy has been successfully sought. The following cases are instructive in their consideration of circumstances in which the Bermuda courts will not grant relief on the basis of alleged minority oppression:

  1. In Gold Seal Holding Ltd v Paladin Ltd, Kawaley CJ held that a company's convening of a Special General Meeting in accordance with its bye-laws could not be oppressive conduct even when the purpose of the meeting in practical terms was for the controllers of the company to reassert control over the composition of the board.12
  2. In Annuity & Life Re Ltd v Full Apex (Holdings) Ltd et. al., Kawaley J (as he then was) held that bare, unparticularised allegations that a certain transaction was entered into other than in the best interests of all shareholders will not ground a claim for relief. Similarly, His Lordship determined that a failure to provide a "satisfactory answer" to queries by a company's minority shareholders about its detailed affairs does not amount to oppressive conduct.13
  3. In the first instance decision in Annuity Re v Kingboard, Kawaley CJ endorsed the English courts' view that mere errors of judgment by management or poor business management without distinct elements of bad faith or self-interest cannot amount to oppression.14
  4. In A Thomas v Fort Knox Bermuda Ltd, Hellman J confirmed that there is "nothing prejudicial" about conduct which results in a certain member holding a majority, where the relevant action was taken "within the scope of [his] authority".15
  5. In the Court of Appeal's decision in Kingboard v Annuity Re, the Court of Appeal confirmed that companies were under no duty to negotiate with minority shareholders on corporate matters which affected the minority more than the majority, and that such failure to negotiate does not amount to oppression.16

The English jurisprudence provides examples of conduct which is "unfairly prejudicial" (under the relevant English statute) and which in certain cases could amount to oppressive conduct as a matter of Bermuda law, including exclusion from management,17 the forced sale of shares at an artificially depressed price,18 and serious mismanagement at board level.19


Minority shareholders have very limited ability to control the direction of the companies in which they hold an interest or to otherwise fetter the near-unlimited power possessed by the majority shareholders, who oftentimes also control or otherwise dictate the decision of the board. But despite this vulnerability, minority shareholders are not without options. As an alternative to the value-destructive just and equitable winding-up regime, the minority oppression remedy provides minority shareholders the opportunity to exit for value from shareholding positions which have become untenable due to the oppressive conduct of the majority.


1 (1843) 2 Hare 461.

2 Succeeded by section 459 of the Companies Act 2006 (UK).

3 Annuity & Life Re v Kingboard et al [2015] SC (Bda) 76 Com at paragraphs 18-25.

4 Latimer Holdings Ltd and Powell v Sea Holdings Ltd [2004] NZCA 226 at [57] per Hammond J.

5 [2010] Bda LR 32 SC at [64].

6 Section 111(1) of the Act.

7 Section 111(1) of the Act.

8 In re Clearsprings Management Ltd [2003] EHWC 2517 (Ch) at [25].

9 [1958] UKHL JO724-1 at [12].

10 [1965] 1 WLR 1051.

11 [1999] 1 WLR 1092 at 1098D to 1099 F, cited with approval in Thomas and Swan v Fort Knox Bermuda Ltd & Ors [2014] Bda LR 14 per Hellman J at page 9.

12 [2014] Bda LR 81 at [36].

13 [2012] Bda LR 9 at [28, [33] and [35].

14 Annuity Re v Kingboard [2015] SC (Bda) 76 Comm.

15 No. 10, above, at paragraph 69.

16 Kingboard v Annuity Re [2017] CA (BDA) 3 Civ.

17 O'Neill v Phillips [1999] 1 WLR 1092.

18 Re a Company (No 8699 of 1985) [1987] BCLC 382.

19 Re Elgindata Ltd [1991] BCLC 959.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions