United States: OCIE's 2019 Examination Priorities And 2018 Enforcement Actions: Practice Points For Advisers To Consider

The US Securities and Exchange Commission's ("SEC") Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations ("OCIE") released its 2019 examination priorities on December 20, 2018, a few weeks earlier than in past years and just in time for the holidays.1 A number of the 2019 priorities are continuations from the exam priorities for 2018, and others have been informed by OCIE Risk Alerts published during 2018. As was the case in prior years, OCIE's examination priorities cover investment advisers and registered investment companies as well as market participants such as broker-dealers and transfer agents.2 This Legal Update gives an overview of the exam priorities for investments advisers, briefly describes certain key SEC enforcement actions brought in 2018 applicable to advisers and offers certain practice points that advisers may want to consider in response to those priorities and enforcement actions.

General OCIE Examination Principles

OCIE made it clear that its announced exam priorities are not exhaustive and will not be the only issues OCIE addresses in the upcoming year. Although the priorities generally drive OCIE examinations, OCIE selects registered entities to examine, and determines the scope of its examinations, through a flexible, risk-based approach. To assess risk, OCIE considers the registrant's operations and service/product offerings and continuously evaluates market conditions, industry practices and investor behavior. OCIE stated, however, that its activities remain grounded in its four pillars: promoting compliance, preventing fraud, identifying and monitoring risk and informing policy.3

Retail Investors: Disclosure of the Costs of Investing

OCIE stated that it is critically important that investors are provided with proper disclosures of the fees and expenses they pay for products and services and that financial professionals accurately calculate and charge fees in accordance with these disclosures. Consistent with its 2018 priorities, OCIE will continue to review fees charged to advisory accounts to make sure that the fees are assessed in accordance with client agreements and firm disclosures. 4 In 2018, OCIE specifically referenced fees that are based on account value and related valuation practices.5

Also consistent with its 2018 priorities, OCIE plans to select firms with practices or business models that may create increased risks of inadequately disclosed fees, expenses or other charges. Although OCIE did not elaborate on these practices or business models this year, it did so in its 2018 priorities, explaining that such practices or models include:

  • advisory personnel that receive financial incentives to recommend that investors invest, or remain invested, in particular share 2 Mayer Brown | OCIE's 2019 Examination Priorities and 2018 Enforcement Actions: Practice Points for Advisers to Consider classes of mutual funds that impose higher sales loads or distribution fees without adequate disclosure of the financial conflicts of interest;
  • accounts where investment advisory representatives have departed from the firms, and the accounts have not been assigned a new representative to properly oversee them;
  • advisers that changed the manner in which fees are charged from a commission on executed trades to a percentage of client assets under management; and
  • private fund advisers that manage funds with a high concentration of investors investing for the benefit of retail clients, including nonprofit organizations and pension plans.6

With respect to mutual fund share classes, OCIE will continue to evaluate financial incentives paid to financial professionals that may influence their recommendations of particular share classes. It should be noted that the SEC's Division of Enforcement (the "Enforcement Division") previously launched a self-reporting share class disclosure initiative in February 2018 (the Share Class Selection Disclosure Initiative or "SCSD Initiative"), in which Enforcement agreed not to recommend financial penalties against investment advisers who self-report violations from January 2014 through the expiration of the initiative (June 12, 2018) relating to certain mutual fund share class selection issues. Under the SCSD Initiative, the Enforcement Division recommended "standardized, favorable settlement terms" to investment advisers that self-reported failures to disclose conflicts of interest associated with the receipt of 12b-1 fees by the adviser, its affiliates or its supervised persons for investing advisory clients in a 12b-1 fee paying share class when a lower-cost share class of the same mutual fund was available for the advisory clients. As part of such settlement, eligible investment advisers were required to disgorge ill-gotten gains and pay those amounts to harmed clients but did not face civil monetary penalties.7 We cover some of the 2018 enforcement settlements involving mutual fund share classes later in this Update.

In addition, echoing its 2018 exam priorities, OCIE stated that it remains focused on investment advisers participating in wrap fee programs, with particular interest in the adequacy of disclosures and brokerage practices.8

On a related note, on April 12, 2018, OCIE published a Risk Alert outlining the most frequent advisory fee and expense compliance issues identified in adviser examinations.9 In this Risk Alert, OCIE described frequently identified advisory fee-related issues cited in OCIE exam deficiency letters, which included:

  • Fee Billing Based on Incorrect Account Valuations - OCIE observed that certain investment advisers incorrectly valued certain assets in clients' accounts resulting in overbilled advisory fees.
  • Billing Fees in Advance or with Improper Frequency - OCIE observed issues with certain investment advisers' billing practices relating to the timing and frequency for which advisory fees were billed, such as advisers billing fees on a monthly basis instead of the disclosed quarterly basis and billing for an entire period instead of prorating for partial periods.
  • Applying Incorrect Fee Rate - OCIE observed that certain investment advisers applied an incorrect fee rate when calculating the advisory fees charged to certain clients (e.g., the charged fee was higher than the fee in the client's advisory agreement).
  • Omitting Rebates and Applying Discounts Incorrectly - OCIE observed that certain investment advisers failed to apply certain discounts or rebates to their clients' advisory fees, as specified in the advisory agreements, causing the clients to be overcharged (e.g., advisers did not reduce fees according to the disclosed fee breakpoint levels).
  • Disclosure Issues Involving Advisory Fees - OCIE staff observed several issues with respect to certain investment advisers' disclosures of fees or billing practices, such as inconsistent maximum advisory fee practices, failure to disclose additional fees and markups from outside clearing brokers, imposition of brokerage fees in addition to wrap fees (that presumably cover cost of brokerage services in a single, bundled fee), and failures to disclose revenue sharing arrangements with affiliates.
  • Adviser Expense Misallocations - OCIE observed that certain investment advisers to private and registered funds misallocated expenses to the funds. This included instances where such investments advisers improperly allocated distribution and marketing expenses, regulatory filing fees, and travel expenses to their fund clients instead of paying such expenses directly.10


  • Advisers would be wise to take note of the 2018 expense-related enforcement actions, which demonstrate, painfully, the importance of the above principles.11
  • To that end, consider periodically reviewing onboarding and fee billing practices. Sample testing contractual terms against actual fee invoices, and disclosed allocation promises against actual allocation practices, should provide a good sense of potential regulatory exposure.
  • Incorporate the above testing and reviews in your compliance risk assessment, as well as your annual review for purposes of the Rule 206(4)-7 under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 ("Advisers Act").

Retail Investors: Use of Affiliated Service Providers and Products

New this year, OCIE specifically mentioned examining an adviser's use of services or products provided by affiliates in connection with their investment advisory services, with a particular focus on the impact to clients and the adequacy of conflicts of interest disclosure.12


  • 2018 enforcement actions against advisers involved use of, and payments to/from, affiliated service providers.13
  • Advisers should review their use of affiliated service providers in connection with their investment advisory services and should:
    • Find out how affiliated service providers are used;
    • Try to document and support the quality of the services provided by the affiliates as compared to those provided by unaffiliated service providers;
    • Find out how affiliated service providers are paid;
    • Evaluate whether the compensation paid to affiliates for those services is comparable to, less than or greater than the compensation that unaffiliated service providers would charge for comparable services; and
    • Evaluate the disclosures to clients/investors regarding the adviser's use of affiliated service providers.
  • The primary purpose of this review is to document a robust process of evaluating, at inception and periodically thereafter, both the quality and cost of the affiliate's services as compared to unaffiliated service providers.
  • It may be that the most effective way to mitigate the risks of using affiliated service providers is for clients and investors (or LPACs/advisory committees) to affirmatively approve the use of, or continued use of, affiliated service providers after fully disclosing the conflict and disclosing how the adviser selects and pays them.


1 See OCIE, National Exam Program, Examination Priorities for 2019 (Dec. 20, 2018) [hereinafter "OCIE 2019 Exam Priorities"], available at https://www.sec.gov/files/OCIE%202019%20Priorities.pdf.

2 Id. at 1.

3 Id. at 5. OCIE noted that in Fiscal Year 2018, OCIE examined approximately 17 percent of registered investment advisers, an increase of 9 percent from 5 years prior

4 Id. at 6.

5 See OCIE, National Exam Program, Examination Priorities for 2018 (February 7, 2018) [hereinafter "OCIE 2018 Exam Priorities"], available at https://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ocie/nationalexamination-program-priorities-2018.pdf.

6 Id. at 5.

7 SEC Enforcement Division, Share Class Selection Disclosure Initiative (February 9, 2018), available at https://www.sec.gov/enforce/announcement/ scsd-initiative.

8 OCIE 2019 Exam Priorities at 6.

9 OCIE, "Most Frequent Advisory Fee and Expense Compliance Issues Identified in Examinations of Investment Advisers," OCIE Risk Alert (April 12, 2018), available at https://www.sec.gov/ocie/announcement/ocie-riskalert-advisory-fee-expense-compliance.pdf.

10 Id. at 2-4.

11 See, e.g., Release No. IA-4975 (July 20, 2018), available at https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2018/ia-4975.pdf (the SEC alleged that an adviser and its employees improperly withheld prepaid, unearned advisory fees totaling $131,000 from 63 departing clients that had requested termination of their advisory relationship); Release No. IA-5065 (November 19, 2018), available at https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2018/ia-5065.pdf (the SEC alleged that an adviser failed to apply advisory fee discounts to certain client accounts contrary to its disclosures, representations to clients and advisory agreements); Litigation Release No. 24206 (July 18, 2018), available at https://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2018/lr24206. htm (the SEC alleged that an adviser steered clients and other investors into four risky, illiquid private offerings and concealed high commissions as well as grossly overbilled some of their advisory clients); Release No. IA4951 (June 29, 2018), available at https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2018/ia-4951.pdf (the SEC alleged that an adviser failed to offset consulting fees against management fees paid by certain advised funds resulting in such funds overpaying around $780,000 in management fees); and Release No. IA-5096 (December 26, 2018) available at https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2018/ia-5096.pdf (the SEC alleged that the adviser failed to properly allocate fees and expenses among co-investors and employee funds).

12 OCIE 2019 Exam Priorities at 6.

13 Release No. IA- 5002 (Sept. 7, 2018), available at https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2018/ia-5002.pdf, in which the SEC alleged that an adviser failed to adequately disclose material conflicts of interest arising out of a compensation arrangement with an affiliated adviser (the adviser in question recommended to its clients that they invest in wrap fee programs sponsored by three other investment advisers, one of which was an affiliate of the adviser). See also Release No. IA-4932 (June 4, 2018), available at https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2018/ia-4932.pdf, in which an adviser entered into agreements with two affiliated investment advisers ("Affiliated Advisers"), calling for the Affiliated Advisers to make payments to the adviser based upon the total amount of its clients' assets the adviser placed or maintained in funds advised by the Affiliated Advisers. The SEC alleged that the adviser failed to disclose these agreements or the payments, which were in contravention of investment management agreements with two of the adviser's clients. The SEC alleged that the adviser also lacked policies and procedures reasonably designed to detect and prevent such conflicts and failed to account on its books and records for the amounts owed and ultimately paid.

To read the full article click here

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

© Copyright 2019. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions