Effective January 1, 2019, California Senate Bill No. 954 will require California lawyers representing clients in connection with mediation to (1) provide written disclosures to their clients about confidentiality restrictions applicable to statements made during or in connection with mediation and (2) obtain written acknowledgments from clients indicating that they have read and understand the confidentiality restrictions before theyagree to participate in mediation. If the lawyer is retained by the client after the client has already agreed to participate in mediation, the lawyer must provide the disclosure to the client as soon as reasonably possible after being retained. The disclosure requirement does not apply to lawyers representing clients in class or representative actions.

California follows the generally accepted position that communications in connection with or at mediations are confidential and are generally inadmissible as evidence. This bill amends California Evidence Code Section 1122, relating to mediation confidentiality, and adds Section 1129. Evidence Code Section 1129 provides that the lawyer's disclosure must:

  • Be in writing in a stand-alone document (i.e., not attached to any other document);
  • Be in the client's preferred language;
  • Be in at least 12-point font;
  • Be on a single page;
  • Include the names of the lawyer and the client;
  • Be signed and dated by the lawyer; and
  • Be signed and dated by the client.

Evidence Code Section 1129(d) also provides form language that lawyers can use for their disclosure and acknowledgement forms that is "deemed to comply" with the applicable rules. (View a sample disclosure and acknowledgement form.)

While failure to obtain a compliant acknowledgment may subject a California lawyer to discipline, it will not provide a basis to overturn an otherwise valid mediated agreement. California Evidence Code Section 1122(a)(3) has been revised to generally allow a communication or document related to a lawyer's compliance with the disclosure requirement to be admissible in an attorney disciplinary proceeding.

Because 1129(d) is incorporated into California's Evidence Code, these requirements apply wherever California courts have jurisdiction, regardless of what jurisdictions the lawyers involved are from. While it is unclear how these requirements apply to lawyers outside of California, any lawyer potentially subject to discipline in California should be mindful of these requirements.

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

© Copyright 2018. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.