After a long-awaited night, the results of the 2018 midterm elections are in and the determination of Colorado's state-wide leadership has been decided. The Colorado Secretary of State's (SOS) office is reporting as of the morning of November 7,2018, that votes have been counted and the following races have been called based on majority percentages.
As of November 7,108, total active registered voters were counted at 3,900,192. With 51% reporting, records indicate 1,973,369 ballots have been casted. Final numbers on active registered voters and actual votes cast by party affiliation will not be available until after this report. As of now, this report will reflect the most recent result reporting by the Colorado counties.
The story of the 2018 Colorado mid-term elections is the independent voter under the age of 45. This voter leaned Democratic but rejected ballot issues typically supported by Democrats. What we saw versus numbers in the 2014 mid-term elections was significant growth in Independent voters.
In 2014 the voter numbers were:
41% – R 32% – D 27% – U
In 2018 the voter registration looks much different:
34% – R 34% – D 32% – U
Republicans also entered the 2018 election with a serious deficit in voter registration compared to Democrats, who had been busy growing their voter registration by 50,000 + voters.
The growth in Independent voters under the age of 45 has increased dramatically – and this group typically votes late and not necessarily along party lines – though the growth in Independent voters leans Democratic. This group is determining future elections in Colorado – unless Republicans can figure out how to register more voters and moderate their message and communication in the future.
A look inside the state elected offices, the state legislature, and the 2018 amendments and propositions can be found in this report as results continue to roll in.
COLORADO STATE ELECTED OFFICES
Colorado Governor & Lieutenant
Governor
Jared Polis & Dianne Primavera (D)
Colorado Secretary of State
Jena Griswold (D)
Colorado State Treasurer
Dave Young (D)
Colorado Attorney General
Phil Weiser (D)
US Congressional Offices
United States Congress – District 1
Diana DeGette (D)
United States Congress – District 2
Joe Neguse (D)
United States Congress – District 3
Scott Tipton (R)
United States Congress – District 4
Ken Buck (R)
United States Congress – District 5
Doug Lamborn (R)
United States Congress – District 6
Jason Crow (D)
United States Congress – District 7
Ed Perlmutter (D)
State Legislature – Colorado House of Representatives
If there is one thing that can be certain, the 2018 primary election was highly contested in both parties, with 15 primaries faced off to compete for the Colorado House of Representatives. Nine Democratic and Six Republican primaries were held this summer with 4 seated Republicans challenged. Two of the four incumbent primary races were lost by the sitting state representatives (HD 47- Otero County & HD 57 Adams County). All 65 House Districts were up for grabs on election night as 45 incumbents faced re-election. Before election night, it was seen that we would only see 20 new faces in the House due to termed-out legislators, primary loss, or the vacating of a seat. In 2018 after the Democrats losing a seat mid-session (HD 35 – Thornton), they held the majority by 7 seats.
As of 10:00 am on 11/7/2018, the Colorado Secretary of State's office is reporting that the Democrats picked up 2 House seats and regained their lost HD 35-Thornton seat. Here is where it gets interesting. As of the most recent reporting, Democrats lost HD 50 held by Democrat Representative Dave Young (Greeley), but picked up 2 seats HD 25 (Rep. Tim Leonard -Evergreen CO) and HD 37 (Cole Wist – Arapahoe County) This now increases the Democrat majority by 11 seats.
STATE LEGISLATURE – COLORADO SENATE
This election cycle, nearly half of the Senate (17 Seats) were up for re-election, giving the Democrats a chance at picking up seats in districts where unaffiliated voters are considered strong. In order GOP to have maintained control, they would have needed to Senate District 24 (Northern Adams County) red and with any luck, flip another highly competitive seat such as Senate District 20 (Western Jefferson County) or Senate District 16 (Northern Jefferson County).
On Election night, we saw a major shakeup. For months all eyes were on THREE Senate District seats t
hat most predicted that would have major impact and would determine the fate of the majority and who would control the Senate in 2019. It is safe to say that that all was left on the field this election. It has been said that Senate District 24 (Northern Adams County) was the mostly watched and most expensive Senate race with the Senate Districts 16 (Northern Jefferson County) and 20 (Western Jefferson County) to follow. The surprise of the evening was to see incumbent Senator Tim Neville of Jefferson County lose his seat to Democrat Tammy Story by a little less than ten-thousand votes.
AMENDMENTS AND PROPOSITIONS
Passed
Amendment A (Constitutional)
Description: Amendment A will remove language from the state
constitution that allows slavery and involuntary servitude to be
used as punishment for the conviction of a crime. Proponents,
including Abolish Slavery Colorado, argue that the constitution
should be updated because it represents a time much different than
today.
Amendment W (Constitutional)
Description: Amendment W will change the ballot format for judicial
retention elections. This essentially condenses repetitive
information and will display an easier format when voted for judge
or justice retention.
Amendments Y&Z (Constitutional)
Description: Amendments Y&Z will allow independent commissions
to draw electoral districts for state legislators and members of
congress. Proponents argue that this measure will take politics and
partisanship out of the redistricting, increase transparency and
give unaffiliated voters a seat at the table. Under both
Amendments, newly created 12-member commissions that would approve
new districts. They would be equally divided between unaffiliated
voters and the state's largest political
parties–currently Democratic and Republican.
Proposition 111 "Limits on Payday Lenders"
(Statutory)
Description: Proposition would reduce and cap the annual percentage
rate (APR) a payday lender could charge and expand what constitutes
unfair or deceptive trade practices. Proponents argue residents are
paying too much for small loans, and can end up borrowing money to
pay off existing loans. Opponents worry about the elimination of
payday lenders all together should consumers go more for
traditional types of credit.
Defeated
Amendment 73 (Constitutional)
Description: Amendment 73 would have increased funding for public
schools in Colorado by changing the state's tax system. The
Measure would/will raise the individual income tax rate for those
with a taxable income of $150,00 or more, increase corporate income
tax, and change property tax rates. Amendment 73 would/will
generate $1.6 billion of new revenue in 2019-20 school year.
Amendment 74 (Constitutional)
Description: Amendment 74 would have required state or local
government in Colorado to compensate a property owner if a new law
or regulation reduced the fair market value of his or her property.
Proponents included the Colorado Farm Bureau and the oil and gas
industry. Opponents include the Colorado Municipal League.
Amendment 75 (Constitutional)
Description: Amendment 75 would have relaxed some state campaign
contribution restrictions if a candidate in a given race gave $1
million or more to his or her campaign or third-party committee.
Proponents say it would help level the playing field between
wealthy candidates and others. Opponents worry that the measure
would further complicate the state's campaign finance
system.
Amendment V (Constitutional)
Description: Amendment V would have lowered the age requirement to
serve in the state legislature from 25 years of age to 21 years of
age.
Proposition 109 "Fix Our Damn Roads"
(Statutory)
Description: Proposition 109 would have directed the Colorado
Department of Transportation (CDOT) to issue $3.5 billion in bonds
for more than 60 road work projects across the state. The measure
differs from Proposition 110 in that it would NOT raise taxes or
fees, and does not include any money for public transit. It also
forces the legislature to spend more on highway projects at the
expense of other state programs. Opponents say the measure fails to
address ongoing maintenance costs and spends too much on debt
servicing (the state would end paying $5.2 billion for the $3.5
billion it would borrow).
Proposition 110 "Let's Go Colorado"
(Statutory)
Description: Proposition 110 would have increased Colorado's
sale tax from 2.9 % to 3.52% and allow the state to borrow up to $6
billion. The $767 million generated annually would go toward a
variety of road, transit, pedestrian, and bike projects that
Proposition 109 does not address. The measure differs from 109 in
that it raises taxes, allows state and local governments to choose
which projects to pursue, and includes money for multimodal
transportation projects. Opponents say that the state should cut
other programs to spend more on transportation. They also say it
spends too much on multimodal transportation and relies on a sales
tax, which they say disproportionately affects low-income
residents.
Proposition 112 " Increase setbacks for Oil and Gas
Operations"
Descriptions: Proposition 112 would have required any new oil and
gas development not on federal land to be set back at least 2,500
fee from homes and "vulnerable areas" like playgrounds,
lakes and rivers. Proponents say this is a safety measure and gives
property owners greater certainty about new locations. Opponents
argue would eliminate new oil and gas activity on most-federal land
in the state and would cost the state jobs. State and local
governments would also receive less in tax revenue should it pass
the opponents believe.
CONCLUSION
As a bipartisan team dedicated to solutions oriented answers for our clients, we see great opportunity in the days ahead. Our relationships are consistently bipartisan and we always see opportunities to work together.
What does a blue tsunami mean for Colorado in the days and months ahead and moving towards the 2020 elections? We believe there are a few important factors to consider:
- Since the Great Depression, midterm elections are typically swing elections and this one is no different. In 2010 and 2014 Republicans had huge gains in response to President Obama's Agenda even though Obama overwhelmingly won his second presidential election in 2012. Colorado went for Hillary Clinton by 5% in 2016 even though President Trump stunned with a winning election. Nationally and in Colorado that swing toward Democratic control was to be expected however, in Colorado's elections the Democratic Party ran good campaigns and largely spoke to independent voters to gain an overwhelming lead in Colorado.
- Republicans have to realize that voter registration and reaching independent voters with a message that resonates with their concerns is paramount, if Republicans are to remain competitive in the future.
- Historically, when Democrats have controlled all branches of Government, they have over played their hand legislatively which has created a backlash from voters and recall elections. Stakeholder inclusiveness, and a bipartisan approach to Colorado's challenges is of the upmost importance moving forward in 2019.
- Rural Colorado legislators will continue to be very important in in any legislative process in the future. Their challenges do not go away no matter which party is in control.
- Colorado has enjoyed tremendous growth and a booming economy in the past 8 years. Colorado's transportation needs in the legislature must be front and center if Colorado is to remain a vibrant state.
- All issues are local. Local control, home rule, local growth play an ever-increasing role in Colorado's future. We see great opportunities in the days and months ahead for innovation and great ideas coming together to prosper Colorado.
We look forward to working with you as a new year approaches. Do not hesitate to call us with any questions or concerns we are here at your service.
About Dentons
Dentons is the world's first polycentric global law firm. A top 20 firm on the Acritas 2015 Global Elite Brand Index, the Firm is committed to challenging the status quo in delivering consistent and uncompromising quality and value in new and inventive ways. Driven to provide clients a competitive edge, and connected to the communities where its clients want to do business, Dentons knows that understanding local cultures is crucial to successfully completing a deal, resolving a dispute or solving a business challenge. Now the world's largest law firm, Dentons' global team builds agile, tailored solutions to meet the local, national and global needs of private and public clients of any size in more than 125 locations serving 50-plus countries. www.dentons.com.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.