United States:
An Unusual Decision Regarding Arbitration
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
As reported by our sister blog, ADR: Advice from the Trenches, the Northern
District of Illinois recently issued an unusual decision. After
finding that both plaintiffs were bound by arbitration agreements
with the defendant and after finding that the plaintiffs'
claims were within the scope of the arbitration clauses, it
denied defendant's motion to compel arbitration.
See Zoller v. UBS Secs. LLC, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44170
(N.D. Ill. Mar. 9, 2018).
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration from United States
Defenses To Contract Damages In New York
KI Legal
Defendants who face breach of contract damages claims can assert several defenses to mitigate, or altogether eliminate, a potential award of damages against them.
Is Premises Liability The Same As Negligence?
Ward and Smith, P.A.
In today's world, we travel all the time. We shop at grocery stores and department stores, we take walks on the sidewalks in our neighborhoods, and we go to large events, such as concerts or weddings, at various venues.
Defamation vs. Free Speech
Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs
The concepts of defamation and free speech often collide, raising questions about where the line should be drawn between the right to express oneself and the responsibility...
