United States: Joint And Several Liability For Payment Processor That Facilitated Fraud

On December 13, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida finding a credit card payment processor jointly and severally liable, under a theory of aiding and abetting, for the full judgment entered against fraudulent telemarketers. Federal Trade Commission v. WV Universal Management, LLC, No. 6:12-cv-01618-ACC-KRS (11th Cir. Dec. 13, 2017) (hereinafter "Appellate Opinion"). The payment processor, Universal Processing Services of Wisconsin, LLC ("Universal") and its then President, Derek DePuydt, did not appeal the trial court's finding of aiding and abetting liability under the Federal Trade Commission's ("FTC's") telephone sales rule ("TSR"), but challenged the amount of judgment. Id. at 2. While some courts have rejected efforts by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ("CFPB") to establish vicarious liability for the acts of payment processors,1 the decision provides useful guidance to payment processors as to the appropriate steps required at the merchant underwriting and monitoring phases.


The principal merchant defendants were found to have operated a telemarketing boiler room scheme to exact payments from consumers in exchange for fraudulent credit card interest reduction services. Id. at 3; Federal Trade Commission v. HES Merchant Services Company, Inc. et al., No. 6:12-cv-1618-Orl-22KRS, at 1 (M.D. Fla. Oct. 26, 2016) (hereinafter "Dist. Ct. Opinion"). After some discovery, the FTC amended its complaint to assert claims of aiding and abetting against Universal and DePuydt under the TSR. Universal provided processing services for two accounts referred by its independent sales agent, Hal Smith. Smith had worked with Universal for more than a decade, and his referrals were so profitable that DePuydt personally reviewed and approved the merchants' applications, glossing over "a slew of red flags" of the potential fraud risk. Appellate Opinion at 4, 8. The FTC alleged, and the trial court found, "that [the payment processor defendants] knew or consciously avoided knowing of the fraudulent activities [the principal merchant defendants] conducted, and that Universal substantially assisted ... in perpetrating the scheme by providing the merchant accounts." Id. at 5. The trial court entered judgment of disgorgement jointly and severally against all defendants, including the payment processor, in the amount of $1,734,972, reflecting the net amounts collected from consumers as a result of the fraud. The trial court premised the payment processor's liability on "substantial assistance rather than on a common enterprise theory,"2 finding that the processing of payments constituted "substantial assistance or support" to the actors committing fraud. Id. at 7, 8. The payment processor defendants challenged the joint and several liability determination, arguing that their liability should be limited to the $410,000 in fees they received.3 Id. at 20. Dist. Ct. Opinion at 12.


Both the district court and the Eleventh Circuit found that there was limited case law assessing substantial assistance liability under the TSR. Both courts looked to tort4 and securities law for guidance to find it within the court's discretion to hold an aider and abettor payment processor jointly and severally liable for the entire harm where a defendant "substantially assists the primary violator." Id. at 7, 10, 11-13. The courts' exercise of that discretion to reject the payment processor's request for apportionment of damages is undoubtedly informed by the facts of the case, including that:

DePuydt deferred almost entirely to his sales agent Smith's referral, because Smith had long been a source of profitable referrals (Dist. Ct. Opinion at 6; Appellate Opinion at 4);

the court found on summary judgement, and the Eleventh Circuit affirmed, that Smith was individually liable for direct violations of the FTC Act and the TSR (Id. at 7);

Smith had substantial involvement with the telemarketing operation; 5 before his involvement with the telemarketing scheme at issue, Smith owned and operated a company that telemarketed debt relief services — until the Florida Department of Agriculture shut it down (Id.. at 5);

DePuydt personally underwrote the applications, ignoring credit deficiencies and a "high risk fraud alert" for the principals of the business (Appellate Opinion at 4, Dist. Ct. Opinion at 6);

DePuydt then approved the second account despite high chargeback levels flagged by MasterCard; "experts for both the FTC and the merchant testified if DePuydt had followed company protocols and ordered an investigation, the processor would not have signed up the merchants" (Dist. Ct. Opinion at 9); and

Universal charged about 16 percent fees on the transactions, of which Smith received 10–12 percent (Id.).

The district court and the Eleventh Circuit found no reasonable basis to parse the harm caused by the payment processor and the primary fraudsters, noting that, "without its payment processing services, no money would have been stolen." Appellate Opinion at 16.


The FTC likely will be emboldened to pursue payment processors under an aiding and abetting theory where a determination is made that telemarketing merchants commit fraud. The TSR provides for such liability. Outside of the telemarketing context, the FTC would need to assert that the payment processors actively participated in the fraudulent scheme in direct violation of FTC Act § 5, a much heavier lift. However, the Dodd-Frank Act extends

liability to covered persons who aid and abet consumer fraud, as do many state deceptive trade practice statutes, giving much more enforcement leeway to the CFPB and state attorneys general. Dodd Frank Act § 1036, 12 U.S.C. § 5536. Moreover, payment processors aren't the only financial services providers who could face liability for aiding and abetting fraud — Prudential Regulators look to banks to assure appropriate due diligence and monitoring of consumer complaints and unusual return rates. 6 Payment processors and their sponsoring banks, therefore, need to continue to establish and follow robust underwriting and screening processes and establish procedures for ongoing monitoring of, and responding to, red flags on merchant accounts. A number of cases outline those parameters. See, e.g., FTC v. CardFlex, Inc. et al., No. 3:14-cv-397-MMD-GWF (D. Nev. May 5, 2015).


1. Please see our previous client alerts, "CFPB Case Against Payment Processors Dismissed: Court Sanctions Bureau for Non-Responsive Discovery" and "Court Finds CFPB Case Against Payment Processor Lacking."

2. The FTC's TSR provides: "It is a deceptive telemarketing act or practice and a violation of this Rule for a person to provide substantial assistance or support to any seller or telemarketer when that person knows or consciously avoids knowing that the seller or telemarketer is engaged in any act or practice that violates §§ 310.3(a), (c) or (d) [prohibiting deceptive practices], or § 310.4 [prohibiting abusive practices] of this Rule." 16 C.F.R. § 310.3(b).

3. In total, the defendants charged consumers $2,592,427, of which $839,849 had been returned to consumers by way of chargebacks and another $17,606 through returns or refunds — a chargeback rate of over 32%.

4. In promulgating the TSR, the FTC looked to tort and securities law aiding and abetting theories to support the rule, noting that "knowledge of, and substantial assistance to, another's wrongdoing are a sufficient basis for liability in tort." Appellate Opinion at 11 (quoting Telemarketing Sales Rule, 60 Fed. Reg. 43,842, 43,851 (Aug. 23, 1995)). See also Telemarketing Sales Rule, 60 Fed. Reg. 43,842, 43,851 & n.97 (invoking securities law in explaining the aiding and abetting rule).

5. "Smith testified that he reviewed the TYS Defendants' telemarketing scripts, sometimes required corrections, and would not write a contract for a merchant account if he was unsatisfied with the scripts. He also said he threatened to terminate the accounts if TYS Defendants hired certain people of whom Smith did not approve, and recommended that they hire a specialist to defend TYS against consumers who sought chargebacks. In addition, he testified that he kept a close eye on the TYS Defendants personally and through a surrogate by visiting the TYS premises to monitor its business practices." Dist. Ct. Opinion at 6.

6. issuances/bulletins/2017/bulletin-2017-21.html; Bank Service Company Act (12 U.S.C. §§ 1861-1867) (extending prudential regulation and examination authority to bank service companies).

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions