United States:
Second Circ. Holds Arbitration Provision In Uber App's Terms Of Service Created Valid Agreement To Arbitrate
23 November 2017
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
Litigation counsel Michael S. Oberman's article,
"Second Circ. Holds Arbitration Provision in Uber App's
Terms of Service Created Valid Agreement to Arbitrate,"
appeared in the Aug. 21, 2017 issue of The CPR Institute's blog
CPR Speaks. The article examines the Second Circuit's holding
that the arbitration provision within Uber's terms of service
as presented in Uber's app interface resulted in a valid
agreement to arbitrate.
Originally published in August 2017
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration from United States
Defenses To Contract Damages In New York
KI Legal
Defendants who face breach of contract damages claims can assert several defenses to mitigate, or altogether eliminate, a potential award of damages against them.
Is Premises Liability The Same As Negligence?
Ward and Smith, P.A.
In today's world, we travel all the time. We shop at grocery stores and department stores, we take walks on the sidewalks in our neighborhoods, and we go to large events, such as concerts or weddings, at various venues.
Defamation vs. Free Speech
Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs
The concepts of defamation and free speech often collide, raising questions about where the line should be drawn between the right to express oneself and the responsibility...
