United States: SFO And Rolls-Royce Agree To Half Billion Pound DPA

Last Updated: February 1 2017
Article by Kevin Roberts, Duncan Grieve and Tola Adeseye

Just over a year after the approval of the first ever Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA), Southwark Crown Court on 17 January 2017 approved a DPA proposed by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) with UK leading engineering group, Rolls-Royce. A 12-count indictment against the company was produced, which included offences of conspiracy to corrupt, false accounting and failure to prevent bribery. Rolls-Royce has agreed to pay penalties amounting to £497.2 million, representing the largest British fine ever imposed on a company for criminal conduct.


DPAs have been available for use by the SFO since February 2014, following their introduction in the Crime and Courts Act 2013 (the "2013 Act"). The SFO made its first application for approval of a DPA in November 2015, settling an offence of failing to prevent bribery with ICBC Standard Bank. Subsequently, in July 2016, the SFO received approval for its second DPA with an unnamed UK enterprise referred to in proceedings as "XYZ Ltd". As explained in our alert on the ICBC Standard Bank DPA, DPAs allow for the suspension of prosecutorial action against a company for a fixed period of time where the defendant company agrees to comply with conditions set by the prosecutor.

The Offence

The hefty financial penalties received by Rolls-Royce are a result of its accepting responsibility for numerous multijurisdictional offences between 1989 and 2013.

The company's civil aviation branch was found to have committed offences in Indonesia, Malaysia, China and Thailand. In Indonesia, a $2.25 million cash bribe and a Rolls-Royce Silver Spirit car were given to an intermediary to facilitate Rolls-Royce's securing of contracts to provide engines to Indonesian airline Garuda. Civil aviation was also found to have paid agents in Thailand to secure similar contracts with Thai Airways. In China, a £5 million cash credit line was provided to China Eastern Airlines in exchange for aircraft engine purchases. Illicit credit lines were also provided to Air Asia employees in Malaysia to ensure Rolls-Royce became a preferred products and services provider to the airline.

The company's defence aviation business was also implicated, as it used prohibited intermediaries in India to secure defence contracts, recording payments as payments to "general consultancy services". This false accounting offence was compounded with a conspiracy to corrupt offence in the same country, as Rolls-Royce paid to retrieve a list of the prohibited intermediaries it used, which the Indian tax authorities had obtained.

Rolls-Royce's energy business committed further offences in Russia, Nigeria and Indonesia. These included agreements to make corrupt payments to agents in connection with the supply of gas compression equipment in Russia, and the bribery of a rival bidder and public officials in Indonesia and Nigeria, respectively.

As well as the offences detailed in the SFO indictment, Rolls-Royce has also been investigated for bribery and corruption by the U.S. Department of Justice and Brazil's Ministério Público, reportedly agreeing to settlements with both. Rolls-Royce will pay the U.S. almost $170 million after admitting bribery to the tune of $35 million, paid to foreign officials in various countries between 2000 and 2013, in violation of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Rolls-Royce in fact agreed to pay a criminal penalty of $195 million under its U.S. DPA, however the fine it received from the Brazilian authorities was deducted from U.S. penalty, due to an overlap of the conduct subject to punishment. The $25 million penalty the company will pay to Brazil related to a conspiracy to bribe officials in Brazil between 2005 and 2008. Authorities in Brazil have become much more active in this area since the introduction of the Brazilian Clean Companies Act (CCA) in 20141 – powerful legislation which assists in the prosecution of such offences

Court Approval

There is no longer a question whether the judiciary is willing to support DPAs, as it has now approved three in just over 13 months. However, Lord Justice Leveson, who approved the first two DPA applications before the same court, stressed the importance of understanding situations where DPAs will be deemed to be appropriate. At the Rolls-Royce application hearing, the judge commented that the public must not be under the impression that an offending company is being treated too favourably when it agrees to a DPA.

Despite the presence of aggravating factors such as the widespread nature of the criminal conduct, the involvement of senior Rolls-Royce employees in the corruption and the substantial amount of illicit funds paid, this latest DPA received court approval. In determining the DPA to be both "in the interests of justice" and "fair, reasonable and proportionate, as required under the 2013 Act, the judge highlighted the factors which overrode the aforementioned aggravating features. 

Much weight was placed on the incidence of self-reporting; the need to incentivise such being described by the judge as a "core purpose" of DPAs. Rolls-Royce's full and extensive cooperation was also remarked on, particularly its limited waiver of privilege over internal investigation memoranda. The judge was keen to emphasise that the exercise of such privilege has been known to seriously hamper prosecuting bodies in their investigations into misconduct, and commended the defendant company for its cooperative waiver.

The steps Rolls-Royce subsequently took to enhance its ethics and compliance procedures were likewise noted. Mention was given to the appointment of a corporate compliance expert by Rolls-Royce to conduct an independent review of its procedures and to monitor its compliance programme going forward. The overhaul of the company's senior management was also given significance. The judge stated his satisfaction that the current senior management is entirely different from those responsible for the running of the company during the period of corrupt behavior.

The negative impact of prosecution on employees and other innocent individuals, as well as the additional expenditure of SFO time and money if full prosecution were to occur, were also regarded factors.

Although the agreement represents the largest ever SFO issued penalty, it must appreciated that Rolls-Royce in fact received a 50% discount on the fine that could have been levied against it as a reward for its early cooperation. Counsel for the SFO at the application hearing stated that fine reductions for DPAs would be generally similar to sentence reductions afforded to defendants that enter guilty pleas at the first opportunity, which currently stands at one-third.

DPA Conditions

The terms of the agreed upon DPA include the following:

  1. Payment of a financial penalty of £239 million;
  2. Disgorgement of profit made on the transactions of £258 million;
  3. Payment of the costs incurred by the SFO (which amounted to £12,960,754);
  4. At its own expense, completing a compliance programme following recommendations of the reviews commissioned by Rolls-Royce (from the aforementioned corporate compliance expert) of the approach to anti-bribery and corruption compliance; and
  5. Cooperation with the relevant authorities in all matters relating to the offence.

Key Takeaways

  • DPAs may be deemed appropriate even in cases where widespread corruption has been discovered. The financial penalties imposed will, however, reflect the severity of the conduct and the profits received from the unlawful activity.
  • Self-reporting and cooperation with authorities are consistently given great weight in determining whether a DPA is in the interest of justice and fair, reasonable and proportionate. The manner and extent of a company's cooperation may also be crucial to the approval of a proposed DPA.
  • The SFO continues to table DPAs which the court deems appropriate. This third approval might be seen to demonstrate a clear willingness of the judiciary to support the use of DPAs.
  • Companies hoping to agree on a DPA may consider commissioning an independent review of existing anti-bribery and corruption controls, policies and procedures at the earliest opportunity as credit may be given for this report – and the commencement or completion of a review is in any case likely to be included in any eventual agreement.
  • The Rolls-Royce case is another example of cross-border cooperation between prosecutorial bodies. This is fast becoming the norm for large corruption cases.


1. The key features of the CCA are covered in our December 2013 alert.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions