Resale Price Maintenance
Resale Price Maintenance (RPM) is a type of vertical price restriction where an upstream supplier requires an independent reseller to resell at a fixed or minimum resale price. RPM is called a "vertical" agreement because it is an agreement between businesses operating at different levels of the supply chain.
WHY MAINTAIN RESALE PRICES?
Suppliers may impose RPM as part of a wholesale price-fixing arrangement. Setting the resale price reduces incentives for individual resellers to undercut each other to gain market share at the distribution/ retail level, and facilitates enforcement of a cartel.
RPM may also originate from resellers who may wish to use RPM to disguise/enforce a price fixing arrangement.
On the other hand, there may be business justifications for implementing RPM within a single-brand distribution or retail network, such as:
- To promote consumer interest in a new product;
- To encourage retailers to invest in customer service and enhance the retail experience, thereby increasing the competitiveness of the brand compared to other brands;
- To improve after-sales and maintenance services;
- To prevent discount or non-prestige distributors or retailers from free-riding on the benefits of investment made by the supplier or other distributors or retailers of the same brand; and
- To strengthen inter-brand competition in a franchise system.
As the nature of these justifications suggests, RPM is usually more likely to give rise to efficiencies where the distribution or sale of the product requires product-specific investment, e.g., at the inception of a new product, within a franchised distribution network, or in relation to luxury or complex products.
WHAT ARE THE HARMS OF RPM?
RPM may restrict competition in the following ways:
Competition law treatment of RPM has traditionally been strict. Recently however, competition authorities and courts in many mature competition law jurisdictions are increasingly receptive to efficiency justifications for RPM. Ultimately whether an RPM arrangement is justifiable will depend on the context of the restriction and must be analysed on a case by case basis.
WHAT ABOUT RECOMMENDED PRICES OR MAXIMUM PRICES?
It may be permissible to give non-binding price recommendations, or suggest a maximum resale price, but problems may arise when:
- Despite not being mandatory, the recommended or maximum prices serve as a "focal point" for reseller pricing; or
- The supplier enforces recommended or maximum prices as if they are a fixed or minimum retail price.
The risk of anticompetitive effects arising from a vertical pricing restriction increases with market power. In determining whether a restriction is anti-competitive, it would be necessary to examine the actual and potential effects of the restriction on the relevant market.
The risk of anticompetitive effects arising from a vertical pricing restriction increases with market
Visit us at mayerbrown.com
Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.
© Copyright 2015. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.
This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.