United States: To Bifurcate Or Not To Bifurcate, That Is The Question

As we noted in a prior post, many state legislatures and supreme courts have mandated that the amount of punitive damages be tried separately from other issues in the case if the defendant so requests.  The principal impetus for mandating this procedure was concern that evidence of the defendant's financial condition, though assumed to be relevant to the amount of punitive damages, is undeniably irrelevant to and presents a grave risk of prejudicing the resolution of the other issues in the case—i.e., liability for the underlying tort, comparative fault, compensatory damages, and liability for punitive damages.

We will address in a future post why the assumption that an organization's financial condition is relevant to the setting of punitive damages is false.  But the purpose of this post is to take sides in the debate over whether this safeguard—colloquially known as bifurcation—is worth invoking.

Over the course of many years counseling clients about defense strategy in punitive damages cases, we have often encountered resistance to bifurcation from experienced trial litigators.  Some of them favor a unitary trial on the ground that it enables defense-minded jurors, when in the minority, to engineer a compromise verdict that is more favorable to the defendant than would result in a bifurcated trial.  We are not in a position to offer an opinion on this hypothesis.

More broadly, trial lawyers often express the view that bifurcation advantages plaintiffs by providing two chances for the jury to express indignation through a high award of damages—once in the compensatory award and once in the punitive award that comes later.  Moreover, as they see it, the second phase is the equivalent of playing poker with a stacked deck.  The jurors are already mad at the defendant and then they get to hear testimony about how rich the defendant is and a fire and brimstone speech from the plaintiff's lawyer urging them to send a message that will be loud enough to resonate in the board room of such a wealthy company.

Regrettably, this is how many bifurcated trials go down.  But it doesn't have to be that way. 

First, the concern about giving the jury two chances to express indignation should be substantially mitigated, if not altogether eliminated, if the jury understands that, should it find punitive liability, there will be a second phase in which it will have the opportunity to impose a suitable punishment.  In our view, part and parcel of the obligation to grant bifurcation upon request is the obligation to explain the procedure to the jury so that it is aware that the liability phase is not the time to impose punishment.

Second, we agree that a punitive-amount phase that is limited to introduction of evidence of the defendant's financial condition followed by closing arguments is generally a disaster for a large corporate defendant and is often a reflection of a failure to prepare adequately to defend on amount of punitive damages.  If that is how phase two is going to be, then bifurcation is probably a bad idea.  But defendants can do better.

For one thing, corporate defendants can put on their own evidence to counter the notion that a large net worth necessitates a large punishment.  This evidence might include testimony that profits are plowed back into R&D, that net worth is composed largely of assets that are necessary to operate the business, etc.  If the defendant is a hospital or a nursing home, for instance, counsel might ask the jury how many MRI machines or critical care beds or night nursing positions it believes should be eliminated and converted into dollars in the pockets of plaintiffs and their counsel.  Evidence might also be presented about the impact that a large punitive award would have on innocent shareholders—e.g., pension funds—and employees.

Beyond trying to defang the financial evidence, in the second phase of a bifurcated trial defendants can introduce a variety of other kinds of evidence that might be too dangerous to use in a unitary trial.  Here are just a few examples:

Subsequent remedial conduct:  Often defendants will change practices, make design changes, or add new safeguards in the wake of the accident or incident that gave rise to the suit.  Evidence of subsequent remedial conduct is, of course, generally inadmissible at the liability phase of a trial because it is likely to be taken by the jury as an admission of liability, and as a matter of policy it is considered undesirable to discourage actors from taking remedial measures because of fear of increased risk of liability for past conduct.  But in the second phase of a bifurcated trial, liability already has been found.  In the hands of a skilled defense lawyer, this kind of evidence could help mitigate the size of the punishment the jury imposes.

Discipline:  Similarly, if the defendant disciplined the employees who committed the conduct in question, that is not relevant to any issue other than the amount of punitive damages, but could be deemed by the jury to be an admission of liability.  In the second phase of a bifurcated trial, however, evidence that the defendant took prompt action to discipline the culpable employees should support an argument that a large punitive award is unnecessary.

Changes in corporate culture, personnel, training, etc.  Often, especially when considerable time has passed between the punishable conduct and the time of trial, there will have been material changes in the company that will enable counsel to demonstrate that the defendant being punished is a materially different entity from the one that engaged in the misconduct.  New training programs or quality control measures may have been introduced that make recurrence of the type of misconduct at issue in the case unlikely.  The guilty actors may be deceased, retired, or no longer at the company for other reasons.  The ownership may have substantially changed, so that the people bearing the punishment are largely or entirely different from those at the time of the misdeeds.  A corporation, after all, is materially different from an individual, and punishment considerations should likewise be altered to fit this different reality.

Judicial enhancements to the judgment:  In some cases, plaintiffs may be entitled to an award of attorneys' fees and/or an award of prejudgment interest at a statutory rate that far exceeds the market rate.  Insofar as the amount of these awards has been ascertained or can be readily calculated—more likely with prejudgment interest than with attorneys' fees—evidence of that amount is relevant to the setting of punitive damages.  The argument would be that a large award of prejudgment interest or attorneys' fees already has the effect of punishing the defendant, so substantial additional punitive damages are unnecessary.

Civil and criminal penalties:  In some cases, the defendant will have paid a civil (or, rarely, a criminal) fine for the conduct in question—often as part of a negotiated settlement.  Needless to say, the defendant would not want to introduce evidence of that in a unitary trial.  But in the second phase of a bifurcated trial, such evidence, like evidence of an award of attorneys' fees or prejudgment interest, would support an argument that a substantial additional amount of punitive damages is unnecessary.  And even if this kind of evidence doesn't sway a jury, it would be helpful to have it in the record for purposes of post-verdict motions and appeal.

Other punishments for the same course of conduct:  Several courts have held that a defendant that wants to argue that it already has been punished enough for the course of conduct that injured the plaintiff must introduce prior punitive awards at trial.  (Whether such a requirement, which can be very unfair, comports with due process is beyond the scope of this discussion.)  Here again, it would be near suicidal to do that in a unitary trial.  Bifurcation allows the defendant to avoid that risk by introducing evidence of other punitive awards only after it has been found liable.  Of course, there remains a risk that the jury will use the punitive awards from prior cases as a measuring stick for its own punitive award, so defendants may elect not to introduce it even at the cost of forfeiting the argument that they have been punished enough.

These are just a few examples of the kinds of evidence that defendants could introduce in the second phase of a bifurcated trial.  We hope that they are sufficient to convince readers that bifurcation holds great potential if employed effectively.  The most important takeaway here is that a well-prepared lawyer must have a fully developed phase-two presentation ready well in advance of trial, including timely witness disclosures, even though the hope is that there will be no need for such a presentation.

Tags: Bifurcation

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

© Copyright 2014. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions