United States: Individual Liability: What’s Behind the Headlines?

It's been open season on financial institutions since the 2008-2009 financial crisis ("Financial Crisis"). State and federal prosecutors and regulators are competing with each other for press coverage of their latest consent order trophies, which include assessments of unprecedented civil money penalties and restitution orders. This focus on "accountability" has gone beyond the institutions, to the directors, officers, and employees of targeted institutions. The imperative to pursue individuals even became the subject of extrajudicial comments when Judge Jed Rakoff recently asked, "Why have no high-level executives been prosecuted" in the wake of the Financial Crisis?1

Over the past year, the perceived failure to prosecute individuals has been the focus of critics from all quarters, including the press, members of Congress, and federal and state agencies.2 In the current political climate, even astronomically large settlements with major institutions are not enough.3

The rhetoric continues to escalate. But what about the reality? Prosecutors are dusting off old tools, such as the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA), and using them to target individuals in new ways. And new entities, such as the Special Office of the Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program, are working together with existing agencies to assist federal prosecutors in building criminal indictments of individuals.

Much of this increased activity is aimed at individual misconduct — direct involvement by individuals in the wrongful conduct. But some regulators have gone further, pursuing individuals for poor management or for having failed to prevent or detect the wrongdoing due to ineffective oversight.

We focus on both types of risk for directors, officers, and employees of financial institutions and other providers of financial products. First, we discuss the current regulatory focus on the perceived need to hold individuals responsible for corporate wrongdoing, including the renewed energy brought by enforcers at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). Next, we turn to the authority of the Department of Justice (DOJ) and financial and securities regulators to pursue civil and criminal claims against individuals, and how those agencies have exercised that authority in recent cases. We touch on the efficacy of directors and officers insurance, errors and omissions coverage, and corporate indemnities as mitigants to personal liability. Finally, we provide some observations about how individuals and the institutions they serve may approach risk mitigation in light of actions being brought by government agencies in the wake of the Financial Crisis.


Holding individuals responsible for corporate misconduct is nothing new. As Judge Rakoff recognized, "[c]ompanies do not commit crimes; only their agents do."4 Real deterrence, the theory goes, occurs only when individuals are held accountable. As SEC Chair Mary Jo White explained:

Another core principle of any strong enforcement program is to pursue responsible individuals wherever possible . . . . Companies, after all, act through their people. And when we can identify those people, settling only with the company may not be sufficient. Redress for wrongdoing must never be seen as "a cost of doing business" made good by cutting a corporate check. Individuals tempted to commit wrongdoing must understand that they risk it all if they do not play by the rules. When people fear for their own reputations, careers or pocketbooks, they tend to stay in line.5

Congress created a new enforcement mechanism that allowed regulators to pursue directors and officers of failed federal thrifts in the wake of the savings & loan crisis. We start there to set the stage, and then discuss the renewed focus on the individual in the current punitive enforcement environment.

A. Financial services regulators

1. Response to the last financial crisis

In the late 1980s, the thrift industry experienced unparalleled losses, leading to the failure of 1,043 federal thrifts.6 To stem the tide of failures, Congress passed FIRREA.7 The goal of FIRREA was to "restore public confidence in the savings and loan industry in order to ensure a safe, stable, and viable system of affordable housing finance."8 FIRREA brought several major banking reforms, including broad investigative and enforcement authority to pursue claims against institutions and individuals.

The expanded enforcement power and increased sanctions were designed to "give a clear signal to those who would violate federal banking laws that such conduct would not be tolerated."9 Congress viewed insider fraud as the root cause of the large number of federal thrift failures, estimating that between 33-40% of the thrift failures were caused by corrupt insiders.10 To combat this intentional wrongdoing, Congress included several provisions in FIRREA expanding the DOJ's and the FDIC's ability to investigate, prosecute, and punish gross misconduct directed toward financial institutions.11 The Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC) and the FDIC took advantage of this expanded authority to file over 900 professional liability claims against failed savings & loan officers, directors, and third parties such as accountants and attorneys.12

A similar call for individual liability is being heard today as part of legal and regulatory reforms emanating from the Financial Crisis.


CFPB Director Richard Cordray said in a speech last year that the CFPB is seeking admissions of wrongdoing from individuals: "I've always felt strongly that you can't only go after companies. Companies run through individuals, and individuals need to know that they're at risk when they do bad things under the umbrella of a company."13

Director Cordray repeated and amplified this theme in a speech to the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago in May of 2014. This time, he appeared to expand the scope of potential targets from actual wrongdoers to individuals who failed to exercise appropriate oversight and management of compliance-oriented controls:

There are legitimate occasions where it is appropriate to sue not only the company that was a party to the consumer's transactions, but also individuals who were decision-makers or actors relevant to that transaction . . . . Under the law, this includes not only a provider of consumer financial products or services, but also, in certain cases, anyone with "managerial responsibility" or who "materially participates in conduct of [its] affairs."14

These comments seem to reflect a view that the Dodd-Frank Act reinforced regulatory authority to go after individuals.

3. New York Department of Financial Services and New York Attorney General

New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman does not miss an opportunity to stress that "individuals in the financial services industry who perpetrate fraud, no matter how wealthy or powerful, must be held publicly accountable."15 Not to be overshadowed, New York Department of Financial Services Superintendent Benjamin Lawsky recently encouraged regulators to "publicly expose—in great detail —the actual, specific misconduct that individual employees engage in . . . . [And] where appropriate — individuals should face real, serious penalties and sanctions when they break the rules."16

4. FinCEN

Director Jennifer Shasky Calvery of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has echoed the same tone adopted as of late by other financial services regulators. In January 2014, Director Calvery spoke about the importance of "financial institutions tak[ing] responsibility when their actions violate the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA)."17 Director Calvery noted that accepting responsibility "is not just about admitting to the facts alleged in FinCEN's assessment. It is also about acknowledging a violation of the law."18

She also indicated that a number of FinCEN's recent enforcement actions have led the agency "to begin thinking more broadly about how the culture of compliance impacts financial institutions . . . ." She elaborated that

[f]or the culture of compliance to be strong within an institution, the business side of the organization needs to take [anti-money laundering] controls seriously. And it needs to begin with the institution's leadership . . . . A financial institution's leadership – to include the board of directors, executive management, and owners and operators – is responsible for performance in all areas of the institution, including compliance with the BSA. The commitment of an organization's leaders should be clearly visible, as the degree of that commitment will have a direct influence on the attitudes of others within the organization.19

Director Calvery specifically highlighted "calls for more accountability on the business side of an organization when [anti-money laundering] compliance fails. This is where a focus on individuals, as well as institutions, might come into play."20

B. Securities regulators

Although both the SEC and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) have a history of taking action against individuals, the agencies' actions over the past year portend increased risks for individuals.

Statistics released by FINRA indicate that, although the overall number of regulatory actions decreased from 2012 to 2013, the number of individuals barred from association with a broker-dealer increased by 46% from 294 to 429, and the number of individuals suspended increased by 22% from 549 to 670.21 Indeed, these same statistics demonstrate that FINRA has consistently increased the number of actions filed against individuals since 2010 and, with few exceptions, the number of individuals barred and suspended has grown steadily since that time. For example, in 2010, FINRA barred or suspended 706 individuals. In 2011, that number rose to 804; in 2012, 834; and 2013, 1,099. These numbers paint a clear picture that FINRA enforcement efforts against individuals are on the rise, with no reason to expect that they will taper off in 2014.

The SEC's statistics on enforcement actions brought as a result of the Financial Crisis show the same trend.22 As a result of the Financial Crisis: the SEC has charged 169 entities and individuals, including 70 CEOs, CFOs, and other senior corporate officers; 40 individuals have received officer and director bars, industry bars, or commission suspensions; and total penalties, disgorgement, and other monetary relief have reached $3.02 billion.23

New leadership at the SEC also has made it clear that companies can expect increased scrutiny for their officers and employees. Speaking in May of 2014, Mary Jo White, the Chairwoman of the SEC noted:

The simple fact is that the SEC charges individuals in most cases, which is as it should be. A recent Harvard survey shows that since 2000, the SEC has charged individuals in 93% of our actions involving nationally listed firms in which we charged fraud or violations for books and records and internal controls rules. An internal, back-of-the envelope, analysis the staff did recently indicates that since the beginning of the 2011 fiscal year, we charged individuals in 83% of our actions. Under either calculation, those percentages are very high—which means that the cases where individuals are not charged are by far the exception, not the rule.24

Chair White also described the enforcement approach that would yield an increased level of actions against individuals: "the staff should look hard to see whether a case against individuals can be brought." She wants to be sure that the SEC is "looking first at the individual conduct and working out to the entity, rather than starting with the entity as a whole and working in."25

To view the full article please click here.


1 Jed S. Rakoff, The Financial Crisis: Why Have No High-Level Executives Been Prosecuted ("Rakoff Article"), The New York Review of Books (Jan. 9, 2014), available at http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2014/jan/09/financial-crisis-why-no-executive-prosecutions/ .

2 See, e.g., Neil Irwin, This is a complete list of Wall Street CEOs prosecuted for their role in the financial crisis, The Washington Post (Sept. 12, 2013), available at http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/09/12/this-is-a-complete-list-of-wall-street-ceos-prosecuted-for-their-role-in-the-financial-crisis/ ; Letter from Elizabeth Warren to Ben Bernanke, Mary Jo White, and Thomas J. Curry dated October 23, 2013 ("we also must look back to ensure that those who engaged in illegal activity during the [financial] crisis and its aftermath are held accountable"), available at http://www.warren.senate.gov/files/documents/SIGTARP%20Letter%202013-10-23.pdf.

3 See, e.g., Letter from Elizabeth Warren to Attorney General Eric Holder dated August 21, 2013 (expressing concern that the historic $25 billion national mortgage settlement was "yet another example of the federal government's timid enforcement strategy against the nation's largest financial institutions"), available at http://www.warren.senate.gov/files/documents/EW%20Ltr%20to%20DOJ%20on%20Mortgage%20Settlement%202013-8-21.pdf .

4 Rakoff Article at 10.

5 Opening Speech, Deploying the Full Enforcement Arsenal, Council of Institutional Investors Fall Conference (Sept. 26, 2013), available at http://www.sec.gov/News/Speech/Detail/Speech/1370539841202 .

6 Timothy Curry & Lynn Shibut, The Cost of the Savings and Loan Crisis: Truth and Consequences at 26, FDIC Banking Review, available at http://www.fdic.gov/bank/analytical/banking/2000dec/brv13n2_2.pdf .

7 Pub. L. No. 101-73, 103 Stat. 183 (1989).

8 H.R. Rep. No. 54(I), 101st Cong., 1st Sess. 291, reprinted in 1989 U.S. Code Cong. & Admin. News 86, 307.

9 Id. at 107.

10 Id. at 260.

11 See Pub. L. No. 101-73 §§ 101(9), (10), 103 Stat. 183, 187 (purposes of FIRREA include "strengthen[ing] the enforcement powers of Federal regulators of depository institutions;" and "strengthen[ing] the civil sanctions and criminal penalties for defrauding or otherwise damaging depository institutions and their depositors.")

12 The FDIC and the RTC Experience, Managing the Crisis, Professional Liability Claims, Ch. 11 at 270, FDIC (1998), available at http://www.fdic.gov/bank/historical/managing/history1-11.pdf.

13 Emily Stephenson, U.S. consumer watchdog says committed to stiff penalties, Reuters (October 23, 2013), available at http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSBRE99M1K520131023?irpc=932 .

14 Prepared Remarks of CFPB Director Richard Corday, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago at 4, Consumer Finance Protection Bureau (May 9, 2014) (emphasis added), available at http://www.consumerfinance.gov/newsroom/prepared-remarks-of-cfpb-director-richard-cordray-at-the-federal-reserve-bank-of-chicago-2/ .

15 Edvard Pettersson, Schneiderman Won't Seek Damages From Ex-AIG CEO Greenberg, Bloomberg (April 26, 2013), available at http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-04-26/schneiderman-won-t-seek-damages-from-ex-aig-ceo-greenberg.html .

16 Remarks of Superintendent Benjamin Lawsky, Exchequer Club at 8 (Mar. 19, 2014), available at http://www.dfs.ny.gov/about/speeches_testimony/sp140319.pdf.

17 See Remarks of Director Jennifer Shasky Calvery, Securities Industry & Financial Markets Association Anti-Money Laundering & Financial Crimes Conference, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (January 30, 2014), available at http://www.fincen.gov/news_room/speech/pdf/20140130.pdf .

18 Id.

19 Id.

20 Id.

21 See FINRA Statistics & Data, available at http://www.finra.org/Newsroom/Statistics/.

22 See SEC Enforcement Actions Addressing Misconduct That Led to or Arose From the Financial Crisis, Key Statistics, Securities Exchange Commission, available at http://www.sec.gov/spotlight/enf-actions-fc.shtml .

23 Id. 24 See Remarks Chair Mary Jo White, Three Key Pressure Points in the Current Enforcement Environment, NYC Bar Association's Third Annual White Collar Crime Institute (May 19, 2014), available at http://www.sec.gov/News/Speech/Detail/Speech/1370541858285 .

25 See Remarks Chair Mary Jo White, Deploying the Full Enforcement Arsenal, Council of Institutional Investors Fall Conference (Sept. 26, 2013), available at http://www.sec.gov/News/Speech/Detail/Speech/1370539841202.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions