United States: Financial Regulatory Enforcers Expanding Claims Against Individuals

In the wake of the financial crisis, federal and state regulators are increasingly taking action against individuals for alleged compliance lapses inside financial services companies, and recent reports indicate that sanctions imposed on individuals are on the rise. This trend in actions against individuals taken by banking, consumer finance, securities and anti-money laundering regulators elevates the risk of individual liability for both compliance professionals and corporate officers. Most telling, the enforcement actions against individuals are reaching beyond sanctions for personal misconduct to address lapses in oversight and management of controls. Indeed, a recent survey found that more than half of compliance professionals expect their personal liability to increase in 2014.1

Securities Enforcement Actions

For many years, securities industry regulators have pursued individual liability in actions alleging misconduct against corporations or financial institutions. More recently, however, these regulators have increased their pursuit of individuals who fail in their responsibility to ensure that companies adopt and apply required internal compliance standards. In October 2013, SEC Chair Mary Jo White announced that the SEC would "focus[] on deficient gatekeepers – pursuing those who should be serving as the neighborhood watch, but who fail to do their jobs."2 Since the end of the financial crisis, the SEC has brought a series of actions against corporate officers, including chief compliance officers ("CCOs"), for institutional compliance issues. For example, in a November 2013 action against an investment adviser for failure to comply with custody rules, not only did the SEC pursue the firm, it also alleged that the CCO failed to take necessary steps to ensure that the firm complied with the required custody rules.3

FINRA takes the same approach. In January 2014, FINRA disciplined a broker-dealer and the firm's former CCO because of inadequate anti-money laundering ("AML") systems and procedures.4 In addition to fines and operational requirements imposed on the firm, FINRA suspended the former CCO for 30 days in a principal capacity, concluding that he was responsible for the firm's AML program, and failed to fully enforce the program.5

FINRA also announced in February 2014 that an investment firm had agreed to pay $8 million over "substantial" AML lapses, and FINRA fined the firm's compliance officer $25,000 for failure to establish and implement an adequate AML program, in violation of NASD rules. 6

Bank Regulatory Actions

Bank regulators also have begun pursuing individual liability more aggressively. In December 2013, the New York Department of Financial Services ("NYDFS") entered into a consent order with a New York branch of a foreign bank alleging that the branch facilitated transactions in violation of OFAC sanctions. NYDFS imposed fines on the branch, and "recognize[d]...disciplinary action taken by the Bank...against individual wrongdoers."7 That action reflects statements made by NYDFS Superintendent Benjamin Lawsky, who recently encouraged regulators to "publicly expose—in great detail—the actual, specific misconduct that individual employees engage in .... [And] where appropriate—individuals should face real, serious penalties and sanctions when they break the rules."8 The OCC and U.S. Treasury also are seeking civil money penalties against individual board members at financial institutions with alleged BSA/AML compliance issues.9

Individual Liability in the Retail Financial Services Sector

The newest regulator on the block, the CFPB, also has asserted claims against individual defendants for compliance failures. In doing so, the agency has relied on "related person" liability in Title X of the Dodd-Frank Act, a cognate of "institution affiliated party" liability in the Federal Deposit Insurance Act. For example, in October 2013, the CFPB filed a complaint in federal district court alleging that a debt-settlement payment processor and a corporate officer violated the Telemarketing Sales Rule by helping debt-settlement companies charge consumers upfront fees.10 The CFPB alleged that the corporate officer "should have known that [the processor] provided substantial assistance to its...partners by processing payments on their behalf and that its...partners were charging and collecting unlawful advance fees."11 The processor and the corporate officer agreed to a consent order under which the processor and the corporate officer are jointly and severally liable for a $1.37 million dollar civil money penalty. CFPB Director Richard Cordray has signaled the CFPB's intent to pursue individual liability when stating: "I've always felt strongly that you can't only go after companies. Companies run through individuals, and individuals need to know that they're at risk when they do bad things under the umbrella of a company."12

FinCEN also has pursued actions against individuals. For example, in April 2014, FinCEN entered into a Consent Order against a money services business ("MSB") and the president of the MSB, alleging conduct that violated the Bank Secrecy Act, including failure to register as a money services business, failure to establish and implement an effective anti-AML program, and failure to adhere to reporting and recordkeeping requirements under the BSA.13 The MSB and its president consented to a $10,000 civil money penalty.14 U.S. Treasury officials have said that FinCEN will "look for more opportunities" to penalize "partners, directors, officers and employees" of financial institutions "who themselves actively participate in misconduct."15 Indeed, FinCEN Director Jennifer Shasky Calvery has broadened this sentiment, stating that: "When a culture of compliance is lacking, the result is ineffective AML safeguards. A number of our recent enforcement actions have led us to begin thinking more broadly about how the culture of compliance impacts financial institutions, often with devastating consequences.... [W]e will employ all of the tools at our disposal and hold accountable those institutions and individuals who recklessly allow our financial institutions to be vulnerable to terrorist financing, money laundering, proliferation finance, and other illicit financial activity."16 The context of recent actions and these positions suggest that future FinCEN action could include more fines for failure of oversight, and an as-yet unsubstantiated report suggests that significantly higher fines against individuals are in the offing.17

Federal prosecutors have initiated a number of lawsuits under the Financial Institutions Reform Recovery Enforcement Act ("FIRREA") seeking civil penalties from bank employees.18 The FDIC has recently "dusted off" FIRREA, a powerful law enacted in 1989 in the wake of the savings and loan crisis, to seek recovery from officers and directors of failed financial institutions.19 In the Southern District of New York, civil prosecutors brought suit against a bank and one of its employees alleging that the bank and the individual engaged in a scheme to defraud the bank's clients when pricing foreign exchange trades.20 The court denied the defendants' motion to dismiss and concluded that the government may bring a claim for civil monetary penalties under FIRREA when an individual's fraudulent conduct might put federally insured deposits at risk. A possible next step could be federal prosecutors pressing individual liability for lapses in oversight.

Clarity for Compliance Overseers?

Government enforcers have long pursued actions against individuals whose misconduct causes an entity to fail or violate finance-related laws. The stakes increase, however, when federal and state regulators seek to impose significant fines and other sanctions against individual corporate officers, including compliance professionals, for lapses of oversight based on their management and oversight responsibilities.

Acts or omissions committed in good faith by oversight or compliance personnel should receive some legal protection, or it will be difficult for these supervisors to exercise the independent judgment essential to their roles. Continued enforcement without transparency and clarity risks chasing experienced and competent compliance professionals and corporate officers from their posts, raising the question: who will be left to oversee compliance with laws and regulations?

In the coming weeks, Morrison & Foerster will host a webinar to present and discuss, in greater detail, the trend among regulators and prosecutors to pursue individual liability in the financial services sector, the potential theories of action and strategies to avoid or defend against such actions. Stay tuned for additional details


1 See Stacey English and Susannah Hammond, Cost of Compliance 2014, Thomson Reuters Accelus, 7 http://accelus.thomsonreuters.com/sites/default/files/GRC00814.pdf

2 Chair Mary Jo White, Remarks at the Sec. Enforcement Forum (Oct. 9, 2013), http://www.sec.gov/News/Speech/Detail/Speech/1370539872100#.U1mBt4_Yx0c

3 In re Parallax Investments, LLC, Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70944, 4 (Nov. 26, 2013), http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2013/34-70944.pdf

4 In re Banorte-Ixe Sec. Int'l, Ltd., FINRA Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent, No. 2010025241301, 4 (Jan. 28, 2014), http://www.finra.org/web/groups/industry/@ip/@enf/@ad/documents/industry/p440109.pdf

5 For additional information on this FINRA action, see the MoFo Client Alert here.

6 In re Brown Brothers Harriman & Co., Harold A. Crawford, FINRA Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent, No. 2013035821401 (Feb. 2, 2014), https://www.finra.org/web/groups/industry/@ip/@enf/@ad/documents/industry/p443448.pdf

7 In re The Royal Bank of Scotland plc, Consent Order Under New York Banking Law § 44, *3 (Dec. 11, 2013), http://dfs.ny.gov/about/press2013/131211-rbs.pdf

8 Superintendent Benjamin Lawsky, Remarks at the Exchequer Club, 8 (Mar. 19, 2014), http://www.dfs.ny.gov/about/speeches_testimony/sp140319.pdf

9 See, e.g., Brian Bandell, Gibraltar bank warns of new regulatory enforcement action, fines over money laundering (Apr. 18, 2014) http://www.bizjournals.com/southflorida/news/2014/04/18/gibraltar-bank-warns-of-new-regulatory-enforcement.html?page=all

10 CFPB v. Meracord LLC, No 3:13-cv-05871, (W.D. Wash. filed Oct. 3, 2013), http://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/201310_CFPB_meracord-complaint.pdf ("CFPB Complaint"). See also 16 C.F.R. Part 310.

11 CFPB Complaint at *4.

12 See Emily Stephenson, U.S. Consumer Watchdog says Committed to Stiff Penalties, Reuters, Oct. 23, 2013, http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSBRE99M1K520131023?irpc=932

13 In re New Millennium Cash Exchange, Inc., No. 2014-03, *2-5 (Apr. 23, 2014), http://fincen.gov/news_room/ea/files/NMCE%20Assessment.pdf

14 Id. at *6.

15 Testimony of David S. Cohen Before the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs, Paterns of Abuse: Assessing Bank Secrecy Act Compliance and Enforcement (Mar. 7, 2013) http://www.banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Files.View&FileStore_id=ce37d31b-318c-464b-8404-f3258c2ec3a6

16 Remarks of Director Jennifer Shasky Calvery at SIFMA Anti-Money Laundering and Financial Crimes Conference (Jan. 30, 2014), http://www.fincen.gov/news_room/speech/html/20140130.html

17 See The FCPA Blog, Treasury may hit compliance officer with $5 million fine(Apr. 21, 2014) http://www.fcpablog.com/blog/2014/4/21/treasury-may-hit-compliance-officer-with-5-million-fine.html

18 See 12 U.S.C. § 1833a. See also 12 U.S.C. §§ 1341-1344.

19 See e.g., FDIC v. Saphir, Case No. 1:10-cv-07009 (D. Ill. Aug. 14, 2012) http://www.fdic.gov/about/freedom/plsa/il_heritage_community_bank_glenwood.pdf, FDIC v. Appleton, Case No. 2:11-cv-00476 (D. Cal. Sept. 3, 2013) http://www.fdic.gov/about/freedom/plsa/ca_1stcentennialbank.pdf, and FDIC v. Killinger, Case No. 2:11-cv-00459 (D. Wash. Dec. 13, 2011) http://www.fdic.gov/news/news/press/2011/pr11192b.pdf

20 See United States v. The Bank of New York Mellon, No. 1:11-cv-06969-LAK (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 24, 2013) http://sdnyblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/11-Civ.-06969-2013.04.24-Opinion-Denying-Motion-to-Dismiss-Second-Amended-Complaint.pdf

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions