United States: In Re Fairfield Sentry Ltd.: Second Circuit Court Of Appeals Provides Guidance To "COMI" Determinations In Chapter 15 Cases

Keywords: Morning Mist, insolvency, COMI, Chapter 15

On April 16, 2013, in Morning Mist Holdings Ltd. v. Krys (In re Fairfield Sentry Ltd.),1 the USCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued an important decision informing fundamental concepts of cross-border insolvency law asimplemented pursuant to Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code. In an issue of first impression for the court, the Second Circuit provided guidance on the determination of a foreign debtor's "center of main interests" (COMI) for purposes of determining whether to grant recognition of a foreign insolvency proceeding as a "foreign main proceeding" in an ancillary case under Chapter 15.

The court held that the relevant period for determining a foreign debtor's COMI is the time of the filing of the Chapter 15 petition and not when the underlying foreign proceeding was commenced, provided that a court may evaluate the gap period between the commencement of the foreign proceeding and the filing of the Chapter 15 petition to determine whether a COMI was manufactured in bad faith. Also, in another issue of first impression, the Second Circuit provided guidance on the application of the "public policy exception" to granting relief under Chapter 15 found in Section 1506 of the Bankruptcy Code. The court's holding was consistent with a majority of courts construing the Section 1506 public policy exception narrowly.

Background of Chapter 15

Chapter 15 largely incorporates the Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency promulgated by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law; it was enacted to facilitate cooperation and coordination with foreign proceedings, to facilitate fair and efficient administration of cross-border insolvencies and to protect and maximize a foreign debtor's USbased assets. Under Chapter 15, a foreign representative of the foreign debtor files a petition for recognition by the US bankruptcy court of a foreign insolvency proceeding as either a "foreign main proceeding" or a "foreign nonmain proceeding." Recognition of a foreign insolvency proceeding as a "foreign nonmain proceeding" enables a foreign representative to seek broad discretionary relief from the US bankruptcy court, while recognition of a foreign proceeding as a "foreign main proceeding" affords a foreign representative certain automatic relief, including application of the "automatic stay" of Section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code to the debtor and property of the debtor within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.2

Section 1502 of the Bankruptcy Code defines a foreign main proceeding as a "foreign proceeding pending in the country where the debtor has the center of its main interests," and defines a foreign nonmain proceeding as a "foreign proceeding, other than a foreign main proceeding, pending in a country where the debtor has an establishment." Accordingly, an important determination in the context of a Chapter 15 petition is the location of the debtor's COMI. The Bankruptcy Code creates a rebuttable presumption that a debtor's COMI is the country where the debtor has its registered office; however, the Bankruptcy Code does not otherwise define COMI. Morning Mist clarifies the issue of the relevant time period for determining a debtor's COMI. Under Section 1506 of the Bankruptcy Code, the bankruptcy court may deny a foreign representative relief to which it is otherwise entitled under Chapter 15 if such relief is "manifestly contrary to the public policy of the United States" (i.e., the "public policy exception"). Morning Mist also provides clarity as to the appropriate interpretation of the public policy exception.

Morning Mist

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The case arose from the Chapter 15 filing of Fairfield Sentry Ltd. (Sentry), the largest of the "feeder funds" that invested roughly 95 percent of its assets, or more than US$7 billion, with Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (BLMIS). Sentry administered its business interests from the British Virgin Islands (BVI), where its registered office, registered agent, registered secretary and corporate documents, among other things, were located. When Bernard Madoff was arrested in December 2008, Sentry's independent directors refocused Sentry's administration on the wind down of its business and the preservation of assets in anticipation of litigation and bankruptcy.

In July 2009, a BVI court commenced liquidation proceedings under BVI law and appointed liquidators with custody and control of all assets of Sentry (the BVI Proceeding). On June 14, 2010 (the Petition Date), Sentry's authorized representatives petitioned the US Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the Bankruptcy Court) for recognition of the BVI Proceeding as a "foreign main proceeding" under Chapter 15.

As of the Petition Date, Sentry had millions of dollars of liquid assets in Ireland, the United Kingdom and the BVI, as well as billions of dollars of claims on account of customer funds, redemption for false profits and similar redemption claims. The Bankruptcy Court found that Sentry had no place of business, no management and no tangible assets located in the United States; the Bankruptcy Court further found that Sentry had severed its ties with BLMIS and other US businesses long before the Petition Date. The Bankruptcy Court ultimately granted the petition for recognition of the BVI Proceeding as a "foreign main proceeding."

Morning Mist Holdings Ltd. (Morning Mist), a Sentry shareholder that had filed a derivative action on behalf of Sentry in a New York state court prior to the commencement of the BVI Proceeding, appealed the recognition order of the Bankruptcy Court. Morning Mist argued that, when considering Sentry's full operational history, Sentry's COMI was not in the BVI and that, accordingly, Sentry should not enjoy the benefit of the US-based stay of proceedings that would follow such a finding. The US District Court for the Southern District of New York affirmed the order of the Bankruptcy Court. Morning Mist appealed to the Second Circuit, and the Second Circuit affirmed.

OPINION OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT

The primary issue before the Second Circuit was whether Sentry's COMI was in the BVI. The court held that the determination is based on a debtor's COMI at the time of filing of the Chapter 15 petition, not at the commencement of the foreign proceeding. The Second Circuit further held, however, that a court may look at the period between the commencement of the foreign proceeding and the filing of the Chapter 15 petition to ensure that the debtor ha not manipulated its COMI in bad faith. Aside from temporal considerations, the Second Circuit held that courts may consider any number of factors in determining COMI, including the debtor's liquidation activities in anticipation of litigation and bankruptcy.

Recognizing that few courts have examined the meaning of COMI under Chapter 15 with respect to the applicable time frame for determining COMI, the Second Circuit looked to the text of the statute, the opinions of other federal courts and international sources to reach its holding. The court found that the reference to COMI in the present tense in Section 1517 of the Bankruptcy Code (which speaks to the requirements for granting a Chapter 15 petition) suggests that a court should examine a debtor's COMI at the time of the filing of the Chapter 15 petition.3 This interpretation is consistent with the interpretation of the Fifth Circuit in In re Ran, 607 F.3d 1017 (5th Cir. 2010).

The court also rejected the argument that the "principal place of business" test, which is an American jurisdictional concept that requires consideration of a debtor's full operational history, should control the COMI analysis; however, the court noted that the "principal place of business" test may be useful in this analysis. Lastly, the court found international sources informative because such sources underscored the importance of factors that indicate regularity and ascertainability of a debtor's COMI to third parties, but the court otherwise found these international sources to be of limited use in determining the relevant time frame for assessing COMI under Chapter 15.

The Second Circuit provided no limits on what other factors could be examined by a court in determining COMI. The Second Circuit held that any relevant activities, including liquidation activities and administrative functions, may be considered in the COMI analysis. In sum, a debtor's COMI will be determined upon the facts and circumstances of each unique case. The Second Circuit ultimately found no clear error in the Bankruptcy Court's findings of fact, which supported the conclusion that Sentry's COMI was in the BVI as of the Petition Date and that Sentry had not manufactured its COMI in bad faith.

PUBLIC POLICY EXCEPTION

Morning Mist also argued that the BVI court restricted public access to the BVI Proceeding in several ways and that the private and confidential nature of the BVI Proceeding was "manifestly contrary to the public policy of the United States" within the meaning of Section 1506 of the Bankruptcy Code.

The application of Section 1506 was an issue of first impression before the Second Circuit, which applied the exception narrowly, consistent with a majority of other US federal courts. The Second Circuit cited the legislative history, which states that "[t]he word 'manifestly' in international usage restricts the public policy exception to the most fundamental policies of the United States." Although the preservation of the right to inspect and copy judicial records is an important public policy objective of US law, the Second Circuit noted that such right is a qualified right, not an absolute right. The court further noted that public summaries of the BVI Proceeding were available, and that non-parties could have applied to the BVI court for access to sealed documents. The court, therefore, concluded that there was no basis to hold that the recognition of the BVI Proceeding was manifestly contrary to US public policy.

Implications of the Morning Mist Decision

In addition to applying the Section 1506 public policy exception narrowly, Morning Mist importantly provides circuit-level guidance on the determination of a foreign debtor's COMI. Morning Mist holds that the relevant period for determining a foreign debtor's COMI is the time of the filing of the Chapter 15 petition and not when the underlying foreign proceeding commenced, and that a court also may evaluate the period between the commencement of the foreign proceeding and the filing of the Chapter 15 petition to determine whether a COMI was manufactured in bad faith. Although COMI jurisprudence will continue to develop on a case-by-case basis, leaving much of the outcome dependent on the factual findings made by the bankruptcy court, Morning Mist undoubtedly provides clarity to such jurisprudence by establishing temporal guidelines for the analysis.

Footnotes

1 Morning Mist Holdings Ltd. v. Krys (In re Fairfield Sentry Ltd.), Case No. 11-4376 (2d Cir. Apr. 16, 2013).

2 See 11 U.S.C. §§ 1520–1521. During the gap period between the filing of the Chapter 15 petition and court recognition, the debtor's foreign representative may request relief that is "urgently needed to protect the assets of the debtor or the interests of the creditors." Id. § 1519. This interim relief is broad enough to encompass a stay on the execution of the debtor's US assets and to suspend the right to transfer, encumber, or otherwise dispose of the US assets of the debtor, and a temporary restraining order of this fashion has become a form of "first-day" relief often awarded shortly after the filing of a Chapter 15 petition.

3 Section 1517(b)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code provides that a "foreign proceeding shall be recognized ... as a foreign main proceeding if it is pending in the country where the debtor has the center of its main interests." Id. § 1517(b)(1) (emphasis added).

Published 19 April, 2013.

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

© Copyright 2013. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions