Worldwide: Competition Agencies In The United States And Europe Publish Revised Best Practices On Cooperation In Merger Investigations

Last Updated: October 21 2011
Article by Richard M. Steuer, Kiran S. Desai and Manu Mohan

Originally published on October 20, 2011

Keywords: competition agencies, United States, Europe, revised best practices, merger investigations, filing stage, merger review

Marking the 20th anniversary of the cooperation agreement between the United States and the European Union regarding the application of their competition laws, the US and EU antitrust/competition agencies have published a revised set of Best Practices on Cooperation in Merger Investigations ("Best Practices"). The new revisions provide greater guidance to companies wishing to facilitate merger reviews, recognize that other countries also may be conducting their own reviews, and emphasize coordination between agencies at key stages of their inquiries.

Published on 14 October 2011, the Best Practices address both the filing stage and the investigation stage of merger review, including determination of remedies. The Best Practices also provide guidance on communication between agencies and with parties (and third parties) at pivotal stages of an investigation, acknowledging that the success of such cooperation is largely in the hands of the parties themselves.

The Best Practices provide:

  • Detailed guidance on how and when firms could seek, and facilitate coordination of, the review of transactions by the US and EU agencies
  • Clarity on how the US and EU agencies would coordinate their investigation of transactions, including at the stage of designing and implementing remedies.

Objectives of the Best Practices

The Best Practices were adopted by the Competition Directorate-General of the European Commission ("DG Competition"), the US Federal Trade Commission, and the Antitrust Division of the US Department of Justice. Consistent with the version published in 2002 (the "2002 Best Practices") the latest Best Practices are intended to:

  • Promote fully-informed decision-making;
  • Minimize the risk of divergent outcomes;
  • Enhance the efficiency of investigations;
  • Reduce burdens on merging parties and third parties; and
  • Increase the overall transparency of the merger review process.

Initiation of Cooperation and Consultation between Agencies

Recognizing the advantages of effective coordination between the different agencies, the Best Practices encourage prompt initial contact between agencies when it appears that a merger may require review by both the US and EU agencies. Such cooperation can begin at the prenotification stage—for example, when DG Competition and the US agencies discuss preparatory steps in cases that are still in the process of being referred to DG Competition by national Member States in the European Union—particularly where the parties have granted a waiver of confidentiality at that stage.

Similar to the 2002 Best Practices, the revised Best Practices identify the key stages of an investigation and the key staff members at each agency that productively may engage in consultations. Recognising the growing importance of economic evidence in the investigations, the Best Practices explicitly encourage consultations between agency economists. The key stages are identified as:

  • Before the relevant US agency either closes an investigation without taking action or issues a second request;
  • No later than three weeks following the initiation of a Phase I investigation by DG Competition;
  • Before DG Competition opens a Phase II investigation or clears the merger without initiating a Phase II investigation;
  • Before DG Competition closes a Phase II investigation without issuing a Statement of Objections or before the DG Competition anticipates issuing its Statement of Objections;
  • Before the relevant Department of Justice section/Federal Trade Commission division makes its case recommendation to senior leadership;
  • At the commencement of remedies negotiations with the merging parties; and
  • Prior to a reviewing agency's final decision to seek to prohibit a merger.

The Best Practices also encourage the agencies to coordinate their investigations—for example, by holding joint calls or meetings with the merging parties and the relevant staff to discuss the timing of the respective investigations.

Regarding the collection and evaluation of evidence, coordination may be possible in:

  • Sharing publicly available information consistent with any confidentiality obligations;
  • Discussing analyses by the respective agencies, including those relating to market definition, competitive effects, efficiencies, theories of competitive harm, economic theories, and empirical evidence needed to test those theories;
  • Possible remedies; and
  • Information or discovery requests directed to the merging parties and third parties, including the exchange of draft questionnaires to the extent permitted by the respective jurisdictions' laws and regulations.

Role of Parties in Facilitating Cooperation

THE NOTIFICATION AND INVESTIGATION STAGE

The Best Practices emphasise the role that parties can play in facilitating a cooperative process, particularly concerning the coordination of the timing of investigations. It is suggested that parties to a merger requiring review inform the agencies in both jurisdictions as early as possible. The Best Practices suggest providing such information as the names and activities of the parties, the sectors involved, the anticipated date of filing in each jurisdiction and any issues relevant to the timing of the merger. Specific topics that could be addressed at this stage include the appropriate time to file and suggested time frames for submission of documents or other information and interviews.

The Best Practices encourage parallel filings in the United States and the European Union, and also recognise that cooperation can best be achieved if the timing of filing allows for cooperation at key decision-making stages. The importance of timing is stressed in relation to those cases where the parties anticipate that the US agency will issue a second request and the parties are seeking a Phase I clearance decision with commitments from DG Competition.

To help facilitate coordination, the Best Practices encourage use of the timing flexibility provided for in the procedures of the respective agencies. For example, it is noted that after the issuance of a second request in the United States and the opening of a Phase II investigation in the European Union, the parties can negotiate a timing agreement with the US agency based on the date on which the parties will certify compliance with the second request, and that, in the European Union, parties can possibly request to extend the review period by up to twenty working days.

LEGAL PRIVILEGE

The Best Practices acknowledge that waivers of confidentiality are common in cases involving cooperation between DG Competition and the US agencies, and that these waivers enable more complete communication between the reviewing agencies and with the merging parties regarding relevant evidence. However, recognizing that legal professional privilege differs between the United States and the European Union, the Best Practices provide that the agencies will accept a stipulation in waivers that the parties provide to DG Competition that excludes from the scope of the waiver evidence that is properly identified by the parties as, and qualifies for, the in-house attorney-client privilege under US law.

REMEDIES

It normally is in the interest of the parties to coordinate the timing and substance of remedy proposals in order to minimize the risk of inconsistent or conflicting results or difficulties in implementation. The Best Practices envision the sharing of draft remedy proposals between the reviewing agencies and the agencies' participation in joint discussions with the merging parties, prospective buyers, and trustees. Particular emphasis is placed on communication and early coordination in cases where remedies may include an upfront buyer and DG Competition is considering a Phase I remedy. Confusion might arise, for example, if the US agency were to conclude that an upfront buyer of the assets to be divested is necessary while DG Competition concludes that parties should be allowed to propose a purchaser after a clearance decision.

In addition to avoiding the risk of inconsistent or conflicting remedies, cooperation in the remedies phase can result in the acceptance of common remedy proposals or even the appointment of common trustees or monitors which could be in the interest of both the agencies and the parties.

Conclusion

In the 2010 case of Cisco/Tandeberg, the US Department of Justice took into account the commitment that the parties gave to DG competition, and it closed the investigation on the same day that DG Competition announced the clearance decision. That action was characterized by then-Assistant Attorney General Christine Varney as "a model of international cooperation between the United States and the European Commission" with respect to which "[t]he parties should be commended for making every effort to facilitate the close working relationship between the Department of Justice and the European Commission."

The 2002 Best Practices have served well, and the greater clarity provided under the 2011 version are welcome. Hopefully, the new Best Practices will serve as a model for cooperation among competition authorities in other jurisdictions as well.

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global legal services organization comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the Mayer Brown Practices). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP, a limited liability partnership established in the United States; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership, and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

© Copyright 2011. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions