Gerald E. Arth was featured in the Business Insurance article, "Ruling Maps Out Class Action Defense Plan: Plaintiffs Win, but Court Exposes Weak Points." Full text can be found in the January 31, 2016, issue, but a synopsis is below.
The U.S. Supreme Court's 6-3 ruling in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Jose Gomez suggested that there may have been a different ruling if proffered payment was submitted in an account payable to the plaintiff, which would have caused the court to enter a judgment for the plaintiff in that amount.
Although the high court sided with the plaintiff in this matter, companies may have been introduced to a new method of minimizing the amount of class action litigation filed.
"The ruling, both the majority and the dissent, leaves open the prospect that a defendant can moot a class action by making an offer of judgment and actually tendering payment of the judge to the court," said Fox Rothschild's Gerald Arth.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
