Executive Summary
With more borrowers and lenders entering into net asset value ("NAV") credit facilities, lenders may want to consider including a double negative pledge within the covenant provisions of NAV credit facility documentation. In this Legal Update, we explain:
- What a double negative pledge is;
- How using a double negative pledge can protect a lender's right to seek additional collateral, deter the borrower from granting other negative pledges, and protect the lender's place as a senior creditor; and
- Why a lender should make sure to have adequate security interests in new collateral even if a double negative pledge is included.
Background
The market for NAV credit facilities continues to grow and evolve. With their increased use, fund finance lenders should be aware of a helpful covenant provision: double negative pledges.
A negative pledge, often included in traditional loan documentation, is a covenant that prohibits the borrower from pledging assets of the borrower to another party, whether or not such assets are pledged as collateral.
The following is an example of negative pledge language in a credit agreement:
No Borrower shall, directly or indirectly, create, incur, assume or suffer to exist any Lien (other than in connection with this Agreement) upon or with respect to any of the property or assets (including the Collateral) of any kind, real or personal, tangible or intangible (including, but not limited to, the capital stock or other equity interest, as the case may be) of such Borrower.
A double negative pledge is a covenant which goes further than the standard negative pledge by also including language requiring the borrower to abstain from granting any other negative pledges to third parties. In other words, the borrower agrees to refrain from (1) granting liens on assets pledged to such lender to any other existing or prospective lender (i.e., the negative pledge) and (2) including negative pledge covenants in any loan documentation relating to other existing or prospective credit facilities.
The following is an example of double negative pledge language in a credit agreement:
No Borrower shall, directly or indirectly, (a) create, incur, assume or suffer to exist any Lien (other than Permitted Liens) upon any property or assets (including the Collateral) of any kind, real or personal, tangible or intangible, of such Borrower or (b) enter into, or suffer to exist, any agreement with any Person that prohibits or limits the ability of a Borrower to create, incur, assume or suffer to exist any Lien upon or with respect to any of the property or assets (including the Collateral) of any kind, real or personal, tangible or intangible, of such Borrower.
What You Need to Know
With NAV credit facilities becoming more prevalent in the fund finance market, lenders to private equity funds whose loan documentation permits the incurrence of other indebtedness and does not already require liens on all of the borrower's assets to secure the facility may want to consider including a double negative pledge within the covenant provisions of its NAV credit facility documentation.
Primary Purposes
In addition to providing the protections created by a standard negative pledge, a double negative pledge has the following primary purposes in NAV credit facilities where other indebtedness is permitted to be incurred:
- Ensures prospective creditors cannot restrict the
senior lender's ability to seek additional collateral when
necessary. A negative pledge keeps the assets of the
borrower, including the collateral pledged to a NAV lender, free
and clear of liens in the future. A double negative pledge achieves
this result as well, but goes further which can be useful in the
event the NAV lender seeks to obtain additional collateral in the
future. Common scenarios are where a borrower's financial
condition deteriorates and the lender requires additional comfort
or where the borrower seeks additional borrowing capacity and
additional security is needed to support the credit. To the extent
that other debt is permitted by the terms of the NAV credit
facility, the terms of that third-party credit facility could
otherwise include a negative pledge on the assets of the borrower
that are not already subject to the liens of the NAV credit
facility, thereby restricting the ability of the borrower to
provide liens on additional collateral in support of the NAV credit
facility. These provisions can therefore be a helpful tool for
lenders to ensure future borrowing base capacity and to bolster the
credit profile of a facility.
- Avoids issues with Acquired Asset Provisions.
While NAV credit facilities are generally secured by collateral
accounts into which proceeds of, and distributions from,
investments are held, there is variation in other assets on which a
NAV credit facility may have liens. In those facilities where it is
anticipated that as assets are added to the borrowing base (or
acquired by the Borrower in the future) additional liens on these
assets (or liens on the equity of vehicles holding these assets)
will be required, a double negative pledge will be helpful in
preserving the ability to put liens on those assets.
- Acts as a deterrent. The covenant would deter borrowers from offering multiple negative pledges to additional lenders and bolster the NAV lender's priority position in the capital stack to the extent that additional collateral is required (or additional collateral becomes available). To the extent that other creditors emerge, the borrower would be prevented from permitting them to include such provisions, and in the event a negative pledge is requested by them from such borrower, the borrower would need to notify the other creditors of the presence of the existing debt which contains the double negative pledge restriction.
Potential Considerations
When a lender in a NAV credit facility seeks to include a double negative pledge in the loan documentation, there are a few considerations to keep in mind:
- Double negative pledges are not a substitute for a security
interest. While the double negative pledge can keep future
collateral unencumbered if the lender needs to acquire a security
interest in the future, the double negative pledge itself does not
create that security interest. To obtain a security interest in
newly acquired assets, the lender must get a pledge of those
specific assets as collateral.
- Although the double negative pledge may have the effect of
putting other lenders on notice that they cannot enter into
negative pledges with the borrower, this deterrent effect can be
minimized if other lenders don't have access to the facility
documentation of the borrower. While other lenders may request this
documentation from the borrower as part of their diligence process,
there may be confidentiality restrictions on providing such
documentation. Therefore, lenders may:
- have to rely upon the borrower keeping track of their debt and
collateral restrictions, including double negative pledges, and
while a lender would likely have a legal claim for breach if the
borrower breaches the double negative pledge, the complexities of
the resulting situation can be avoided if subsequent lenders have
access to all previous loan documentation, or
- consider requesting a precautionary filing of an all assets
UCC-1 financing statement that puts potential creditors on notice
that assets have been pledged, even though no corresponding
security interest has been created. However, in this case, lenders
should also be prepared for the need to potentially modify the
filing if needed and/or provide representations or other evidence
to subsequent lenders that the corresponding security agreement
does not exist.
- have to rely upon the borrower keeping track of their debt and
collateral restrictions, including double negative pledges, and
while a lender would likely have a legal claim for breach if the
borrower breaches the double negative pledge, the complexities of
the resulting situation can be avoided if subsequent lenders have
access to all previous loan documentation, or
- Since double negative pledges typically operate only at, or immediately below, the level of the parties to the loan documentation, lenders in most NAV credit facilities will be structurally subordinated to liens incurred at a level at or below the underlying investment. Accordingly, lenders should keep in mind that double negative pledges may not prevent the issues that relate to subordination from subsidiary-level debt.
Next Steps
Fund finance lenders entering into NAV credit facilities with borrowers that permit the incurrence of other indebtedness may want to consider whether it would be worthwhile to include a double negative pledge in their NAV credit facility documentation. Doing so can protect the lender's right to seek additional collateral, deter the borrower from granting other negative pledges, and protect the lender's place as a senior creditor.
Visit us at mayerbrown.com
Mayer Brown is a global services provider comprising associated legal practices that are separate entities, including Mayer Brown LLP (Illinois, USA), Mayer Brown International LLP (England & Wales), Mayer Brown (a Hong Kong partnership) and Tauil & Chequer Advogados (a Brazilian law partnership) and non-legal service providers, which provide consultancy services (collectively, the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are established in various jurisdictions and may be a legal person or a partnership. PK Wong & Nair LLC ("PKWN") is the constituent Singapore law practice of our licensed joint law venture in Singapore, Mayer Brown PK Wong & Nair Pte. Ltd. Details of the individual Mayer Brown Practices and PKWN can be found in the Legal Notices section of our website. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of Mayer Brown.
© Copyright 2023. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.
This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.