United States:
The Pros And Cons Of Requiring Workplace Arbitration
23 September 2016
Fox Rothschild LLP
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
We've written extensively about mandatory workplace
arbitration. But it was still an honor when CEB, a
program of the University of California that is cosponsored by the
State Bar of California, asked me to write a guest post for
their CEBlog on the pros and cons of
implementing such a program. You can read that post here. This is an
issue that every employer should give serious thought to.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Employment and HR from United States
Final Rule: Employee vs. Independent Contractor
Thompson Burton
On March 11, 2024, the Department of Labor's ("DOL") final rule ("Final Rule") took effect, which rescinded the 2021 Independent Contractor Rule (the "Prior Rule") under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA").
Employment Law Update, April 11, 2024
Parsons Behle & Latimer
Would you believe it? California is considering expanding employee rights. The California legislature is considering a bill that would curtail employers from contacting employees...
