United States:
Trump, Congress Should Break Up SEC's In-House Courts
10 January 2017
WilmerHale
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
The late Justice Antonin Scalia, in a 2013 interview with New
York Magazine, said that "[a] lot of stuff that's stupid
is not unconstitutional."
Stupid may be too strong a word to describe the Dodd-Frank
Act's expansion of the SEC's ability to use its in-house
courts to obtain multi-million-dollar judgments. But, that
expansion was a very bad idea, regardless of whether it is
constitutional.
Click here to continue reading.
Originally published by The Hill.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Consumer Protection from United States
Dark Chocolate And Heavy Metals
Holland & Knight
In December 2022, Consumer Reports published a study on lead and cadmium in dark chocolate. Dark chocolate came into vogue when studies showed antioxidants in it may have health benefits.
Product Liability Update - April 2024
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan
A slew of cases filed in the past year may have you asking, "is the next product liability plaintiff frontier the land of the Social Media Giants?" The plaintiffs in these cases range from personal injury claimants...