A recent High Court decision has confirmed that clear words to exclude misrepresentation claims are needed in an entire agreement clause intended to exclude liability for misrepresentation.

Background

Liability for misrepresentation arises if:

  • one party makes a false statement;
  • the other party relies on that statement in deciding to enter the agreement; and
  • that other party suffers loss as a result.

There have been various cases in which a party, as a defence against liability for a claim for misrepresentation, has tried to rely on an entire agreement clause that denies contractual force to statements other than those in the final agreement.

Facts

In our summer 2018 edition, we reported (click here for the facts) on a preliminary decision of the High Court in which the master held that an entire agreement clause, when construed in the context of the share purchase agreement as a whole, excluded the seller's liability for misrepresentation. This was despite the fact that the clause did not include wording to negate reliance or exclude liability for misrepresentation. As noted in that report, the master's approach was inconsistent with the general judicial approach that clear words are necessary to exclude liability for misrepresentation. 

The clause in question read as follows:

"This agreement (together with the documents referred to in it) constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes and extinguishes all previous discussions, correspondence, negotiations, drafts, agreements, promises, assurances, warranties, representations and understandings between them, whether written or oral, relating to its subject matter."

Decision

On appeal by the buyer, the High Court judge reversed the master's decision. He held that this entire agreement clause was not effective to exclude misrepresentation claims as there was no "clear wording establishing an intention to go beyond defining the scope of the contractual agreement and exclude other claims".  

The reference to representations, correspondence, negotiations etc. did not amount to clear wording establishing an intention to go beyond defining the scope of the contractual agreement. All of those terms were consistent with matters that might, in the absence of an entire agreement clause, be relied upon to found a claim to a collateral agreement or collateral warranty (i.e. the scope of the contractual agreement). 

The mere possibility that the words used might be capable of founding other types of claim (e.g. misrepresentation) as well did not establish the necessary intention.

Further, while the court was entitled to have regard to all the provisions of an agreement in construing any of them, it was not relevant that another clause of the contract gave the buyer a contractual indemnity right to recover in respect of the same subject matter (the amount of the company's liabilities) as the misrepresentation claim. It might have made commercial sense to exclude a claim in misrepresentation for the indemnified loss but the parties did not provide for this in the contract, and the court should not intervene. 

Comment

The decision confirms that a party wishing to exclude liability for misrepresentation should deal with this issue directly when drafting the entire agreement clause. In other words, the clause should not simply set out what constitutes the agreement between the parties, but should go on expressly to exclude liability for misrepresentation. A typical exclusion will provide that the relevant party has no liability for, and no other party has relied on, any representation not expressly set out in the agreement. It should also limit the remedy for any representation expressly set out in the agreement to damages for breach of contract.

Al-Hasawi v. Nottingham Forest Football Club Ltd [2018] EWHC 2884 (Ch)

Dentons is the world's first polycentric global law firm. A top 20 firm on the Acritas 2015 Global Elite Brand Index, the Firm is committed to challenging the status quo in delivering consistent and uncompromising quality and value in new and inventive ways. Driven to provide clients a competitive edge, and connected to the communities where its clients want to do business, Dentons knows that understanding local cultures is crucial to successfully completing a deal, resolving a dispute or solving a business challenge. Now the world's largest law firm, Dentons' global team builds agile, tailored solutions to meet the local, national and global needs of private and public clients of any size in more than 125 locations serving 50-plus countries. www.dentons.com.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.