On 27 February 2020, the UK government unofficially announced that the UK will not participate in the Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court system. The decision was confirmed by a spokesperson for the prime minister, who stated that "Participating in a court that applies EU law and bound by the CJEU is inconsistent with our aims of becoming an independent self-governing nation".

The UK government's decision raises fresh concerns as to the future of the Unified Patent Court ("UPC"), a new international court that, should it come into existence, shall have exclusive competence on hearing disputes concerning European patents and European patents with unitary effect (subject to certain exceptions during the UPC's transitional period).

It is currently unclear how the UK government's decision will impact the implementation of the UPC, particularly given the UK's involvement in the UPC project to date. Such involvement includes the UK (alongside Germany and France) being one of three signatories whose ratification was required for the UPC to come into force. Likewise, a central division of the UPC was to be located in London and was set to host patent disputes concentrated on the life sciences sector.

Speaking today (4 March 2020) in London, Antonio Campinos, president of the European Patent Office, described the UK government's decision as a "great pity", but dismissed any claims that the decision was a "decisive blow" to the UPC project. Whereas France and the UK ratified the agreement to establish the UPC in 2014 and 2018 respectively, an ongoing  constitutional challenge in the German Federal Constitutional Court has stalled the adoption of the UPC. The German Federal Constitutional Court announced in November 2019 an intention to hand down its decision on the constitutional challenge in early 2020, but as of yet no decision has been provided.

In light of the UK government's decision, and to the extent it was not already done so, attention is now firmly drawn to the decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court with regards to the future viability of the UPC project.

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

© Copyright 2020. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.