India: Insolvency And Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2019 - Key Changes

Last Updated: 16 August 2019
Article by Trilegal .

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2019 seeks to address critical gaps and inconsistencies in insolvency resolution timelines, payments received by operational creditors under a resolution plan and manner of voting by an authorised representative on behalf of the class of financial creditors


The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (Code) is one of the most significant measures undertaken by the Government to address the substantial increase in the level of distressed debt in India. The Code sets out a time-bound insolvency resolution process for defaulting corporate debtors and introduces a creditor-in-possession model whereby a committee of creditors (CoC) is constituted to take decisions regarding the operations of the corporate debtor, including evaluating prospective resolution plans for resolving the corporate debtor's account. The Code was a remarkable step towards resolution of stressed assets, however certain critical inconsistencies and gaps became evident given various legal proceedings initiated in respect of corporate insolvency resolution processes (CIRP).

Additionally, there have been certain judicial pronouncements recently which are being viewed as contrary to the Code's envisioned priority of distribution to financial creditors vis-à-vis operational creditors.

To address some of these issues, the Parliament passed the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2019 (Amendment) which received Presidential assent on 5 August 2019 and will become effective from such date that the Central Government may appoint by notification.

Key Changes

(a) Clarity on allowing comprehensive corporate restructuring through merger, amalgamation and demerger under a resolution plan

Under the Code, it was unclear whether resolution plans could include restructuring provisions such as mergers, demergers or amalgamations. The market practice was to utilize these modes of corporate restructuring in various permutations and combinations. The Amendment clarifies that a 'resolution plan' may include provisions for restructuring by way of merger, amalgamation, and demerger. This clarification can be seen as legitimising existing practices being used to arrive at a commercial resolution.

(b) Time-bound disposal of the resolution application

In order to initiate a CIRP in respect of a corporate debtor, any creditor/corporate debtor may file an application (Resolution Application) before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). The Code provides a period of 14 days for the NCLT to 'ascertain the existence of default' and admit or reject a Resolution Application for initiating insolvency proceedings.

The Supreme Court in the case of J.K. Jute Mills Co. Ltd. v/s Surendra Trading Co. had concurred with the opinion of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) that this time limit of 14-days is directory rather than mandatory, and that the NCLT has inherent powers to extend the 14-day period on a case-to-case basis in the interest of fairness and justice. In practice, in many cases, the NCLT would take 3 weeks to a month to ascertain the existence of a default before admitting or rejecting a Resolution Application.

The Amendment introduces judicial discipline in this respect by making it mandatory for the NCLT to pass an order admitting or rejecting a Resolution Application within 14 days from the date of its receipt. In the event of a failure to do so, the NCLT is now required to record the reasons in writing for the delay in determination of default. This amendment therefore seeks to ensure that the 14 day period is only extended in exceptional cases and not as a matter of routine.

(c) Timeline for completion of CIRP increased to an overall limit of 330 days

Prior to the Amendment, the Code required that the CIRP should be concluded within a maximum period of 180 days (with a maximum one-time extension of 90 days) from the insolvency commencement date (the Code denotes this to be the date of appointment of interim resolution professional). However, many CIRPs were exceeding this overall 270-day limit on account of legal proceedings initiated either against the corporate debtor, the CoC or the Resolution Professional.

The Amendment provides that the CIRP must mandatorily be completed within an overall timeline of 330 days from the insolvency commencement date (including all or any extensions granted as well as any litigations and related legal proceedings). Additionally, for an ongoing CIRP, in case the 330-day overall timeline has already been breached at the time the Amendment comes into force, the Amendment provides for an additional relaxation of 90 days as a transitionary measure.

The use of the words 'mandatory' and 'shall be completed' is a further clear indication to complete the CIRP in the specified time frame of 330 days without exception.

(d) Voting by an authorised representative on behalf of certain classes of financial creditors

In order to facilitate decision making in the CoC, the Code provided that if an authorised representative represents several financial creditors, then he shall cast his vote in respect of each financial creditor in accordance with instructions received, to the extent of his voting share.

To simplify this voting process for CIRPs involving a large number of financial creditors (such as homebuyers, beneficiaries of securities or deposits held with a trustee, etc.), the Amendment clarifies that the authorised representative of a particular class of financial creditors will vote in the CoC, on behalf of all financial creditors represented by him as per the decision taken by a vote of more than 50% of the voting share of the financial creditors of such class, who have cast their vote. Such majority vote within a class of creditors will be counted as a 100% vote from that class of creditors in favour or against a voting item. For instance, if out of a class of 100 homebuyers 51 or more homebuyers vote in favour of a resolution plan, then all homebuyers would be considered to have voted in favour of the resolution plan.

This amendment will not only facilitate a simplified voting process for classes of creditors but will help the authorised representative to effectively participate in the CoC proceedings and cast his vote on behalf of the financial creditors he represents. This will smoothen the decision-making process in cases where debenture-holders, homebuyers, depositors or other classes form a significant percentage of the CoC.

Further, it is clarified that the amended voting process will not be applicable for taking a decision on the withdrawal of a Resolution Application and the voting process in such cases will be as originally provided under the Code wherein each individual financial creditor will vote individually.

(e) Distributions under the Resolution Plan

The most important change brought by the Amendment is in terms of the inter-creditor distribution of payments during CIRP. Prior to the Amendment, the Code provided that payment to operational creditors under a resolution plan must not be less than the amount that the operational creditors would have received in a liquidation scenario.

However, the Amendment has included an additional requirement – stating that the payment received by operational creditors must not be less than the higher of:

(i) the amount such operational creditors would have received in the event of a liquidation of the corporate debtor as per section 53 of the Code; or

(ii) the amount such operational creditors would have received if the amount distributed under the resolution plan was distributed in accordance with the priority specified as per the liquidation waterfall under section 53 of the Code.

The Amendment provides that payments to financial creditors who do not vote in favour of a resolution plan will be determined in accordance with regulations framed by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India; but will not be less than the amount that would have been paid to such creditors in the event of liquidation of the corporate debtor.

Additionally, the Amendment clarifies that such payments made to operational creditors as well as dissenting financial creditors under the resolution plan will be construed as fair and equitable to such creditors, thereby reducing the scope of judicial intervention and litigation at this stage.

The Amendment also provides for retrospective application of the above minimum payments to financial and operational creditors under all pending CIRP proceedings namely, those CIRPs:

(i) where the resolution plan has not been approved or rejected by the NCLT; or

(ii) where an appeal has been preferred before the NCLAT/Supreme Court or such appeal is not time-barred under any provision of law for the time being in force; or

(iii) where a legal proceeding has been initiated in any court against the decision of the NCLT in respect of a resolution plan.

The Amendment clarifies that the manner of distribution of claims must take into account the order of priority amongst creditors as specified under the liquidation waterfall provided under section 53 of the Code, including the priority and value of the security interest of a secured creditor.

These changes are relevant in the context of the recent NCLAT order dated 4 July 2019 in respect of the ongoing CIRP of Essar Steel India Limited (Essar Order). In this order, the NCLAT's views were seen as being widely out of sync with the Code's vision of a creditor-in-control model and primacy of financial creditors. The Essar Order held that one of the benchmarks for assessing the viability and feasibility of a resolution plan is whether operational creditors are given roughly the same treatment as financial creditors and if not, then such resolution plan must be modified or rejected so that the rights of the operational creditors are safeguarded. However, on 22 July 2019, the Supreme Court observed that the NCLAT could not act as a resolution professional and distribute funds. Accordingly, it passed a status quo order and the implementation of the Essar Order was kept on hold. The appeals are currently listed for hearing.

(f) Resolution Plan binding on all Stakeholders

Under the Code, once a resolution plan is approved, it is binding on all stakeholders. The Amendment aims to capture this spirit by specifically providing that a resolution plan will also be binding on the Central Government, State Governments or any local authority to whom a debt in respect of payment of dues is owed. This amendment will reduce delays caused by the government or any local authority raising demands post-approval of a resolution plan and makes it clear that once a resolution plan is approved, it is binding on them as well.

(g) Liquidation by the CoC

The Amendment clarifies that the CoC may take the decision to liquidate the corporate debtor any time after the CoC is constituted and before the confirmation of the resolution plan, including at any time before the preparation of the information memorandum.

This can have a significant impact on stakeholders in the CIRP, as this essentially gives the CoC the power to liquidate the corporate debtor in suitable situations even prior to the information memorandum stage (for instance where the 330-day CIRP period might not result in any credible bidders and may devalue the assets further) and the only mode left for value-maximization of the corporate debtor is liquidation.

(h) Powers of the CoC

In addition to giving new powers to the CoC to liquidate the corporate debtor, the Amendment also clarifies the scope of power of the CoC and its role during the CIRP. The Essar Order had severely curtailed the powers of the CoC vis-à-vis consultation and negotiation with bidders while evaluating any resolution plan. The Essar Order held that the CoC can only approve or reject a resolution plan and cannot negotiate it with a resolution applicant to bargain for better terms (the Essar Order stated that the CoC can only request the resolution applicant to do so).

However, the Amendment seeks to change that and in clear words has empowered the CoC to commercially consider the manner of distribution proposed in the resolution plan while deciding its feasibility and viability. The CoC can evaluate such manner of distribution by taking into account the order of priority amongst creditors as per the liquidation waterfall in section 53 of the Code, including the priority and value of the security interest of a secured creditor.

Key Takeaways

The Amendment is the third round of changes to the Code since its inception. These amendments focus on the revival of a corporate debtor by ensuring timely admission and completion of the resolution process and instilling discipline amongst the stakeholders to avoid inordinate delays. However, the most important and awaited changes brought by the Amendment are to reverse the views taken by the NCLAT in the Essar Order and restore the spirit of the Code by providing important clarifications. To summarise, the key changes brought by the Amendment are:

(a) Vis-à-vis distribution of payments

(i) The Amendment recognizes and restores the order of priority of financial creditors in relation to operational creditors in clear terms;

(ii) The Amendment also recognizes inter-se hierarchy amongst secured and unsecured creditors, a crucial distinction removed by the Essar Order; and

(iii) The new minimum introduced for operational creditors and the order of priority discussed above gives recognition to the practice of using the liquidation waterfall under section 53 of the Code as a yardstick to decide the distributions under the resolution plan.

(b) Vis-à-vis powers of the CoC

(i) The Amendment gives wide powers to the CoC for liquidation of a corporate debtor anytime during a CIRP; and

(ii) The Amendment restores the powers of a CoC to evaluate a resolution plan based on commercial consideration and certain defined parameters which was severely curtailed by the Essar Order.

By enhancing the participation and streamlining the decision-making process of different classes of financial creditors (such as homebuyers, debenture holders, depositors etc.) in the CoC, and introducing comprehensive structuring schemes, the Amendment has sought to keep the Code in sync with changing times and the unique challenges that several cases have posed.

The amendments therefore seek to enhance creditor and investor confidence in the CIRP and ensure that the objective of the Code is not diluted.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Link Legal India Law Services
In association with
Practice Guides
by Mondaq Advice Centres
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Link Legal India Law Services
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions