India: Supreme Court's Ruling On Pension Scheme

Last Updated: 10 May 2019
Article by Trilegal .
Most Popular Article in India, May 2019

Background

On 1 April 2019, the Supreme Court in The Employees' Provident Fund Organization and Anr. v Sunil Kumar B & Ors. (SC Ruling) upheld the 2018 Kerala High Court decision in P. Sasikumar and Ors. v Union of India and Ors. (Kerala HC Ruling) which had set aside the Employees' Pension (Amendment) Scheme, 2014 (2014 Amendment).

In accordance with the Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (EPF Act) and the Employees' Pension Scheme, 1995 (Pension Scheme), an employer and employee are required to contribute 12% each from the employee's salary. While the employee's contribution of 12% is entirely allocated towards the employee's provident fund (EPF) account, the employer's contribution is split - 8.33% into the employee's pension (EPS) account and 3.67% into the EPF account. Prior to the 2014 Amendment, for domestic employees (i.e. employees holding Indian Passports) the contribution could be capped at 12% of INR 6,500 per month. However, organizations and employees would usually pay uncapped contributions and would not limit the same to the INR 6,500 threshold. For example, an individual earning INR 1,00,000 per month would receive INR 12,000 as employer's contribution (split 8.33% into the EPS account and 3.67% into the EPF account) and the employee would also contribute INR 12,000 into the EPF account. The provision was the same for 'International Workers' (IWs) i.e. employees who hold non-Indian passports

However, the 2014 Amendment introduced certain critical amendments that were not well received by stakeholders. While the 2014 Amendment increased the maximum salary cap to INR 15,000 per month (from the earlier INR 6,500 per month), it excluded all new members who earned above this sum from pension completely i.e. the aforementioned 8.33% employer contribution would instead go into the EPF account for such members. Further, it gave only a short window of six months to existing members to choose whether or not they wished to make uncapped pension contributions i.e. contribute towards the Pension Scheme at their uncapped salary without limiting it to INR 15,000. In the above example, the employee earning INR 100,000 per month would be entirely excluded from pension if he/she was a new PF member (i.e. became a member after the 2014 Amendment). For someone who was an existing member, their pension contribution would be limited to INR 1,250 per month (i.e. 8.33% of INR 15,000), unless they opted within the six-month window to continue making uncapped contributions. Consequently, the pension payable to employees was substantially reduced leading to petitions being filed against this amendment.

2014 Amendment - Key Provisions

Key elements of the 2014 Amendment are outlined as follows:

(a) salary ceiling was increased from INR 6,500 to INR 15,000 per month;

(b) new members (joining on or after 1 September 2014) drawing salary exceeding INR 15,000 per month were not eligible to contribute to the Pension Scheme at all;

(c) existing members as on 1 September 2014 (whose contribution towards the Pension Scheme had been on salary exceeding INR 6,500 per month) had an option to make contributions on a higher salary (i.e. exceeding the new ceiling of INR 15,000 per month) by expressly opting for the same within a six-month window. This was further subject to the condition that such member would have to contribute an additional 1.16% (on the salary exceeding INR 15,000 per month) from his/ her share of contribution. Prior to the amendment, the Central Government would contribute at the rate of 1.16% of an employees' salary (capped at INR 6,500) towards the Pension Scheme

(d) the pensionable salary was to be calculated on the average monthly pay for the last 60 months preceding the date of exit from the membership of the Pension Scheme. This was 12 months earlier.

The Kerala HC Ruling

Several writ petitions were filed before the Kerala High Court, challenging the validity of the 2014 Amendment. After hearing the petitions, the Kerala High Court ruled on 12 October 2018 that the 2014 Amendment had resulted in creating different classes of pensioners who received different pension benefits on the basis of a date (i.e. 1 September 2014). It noted that the following classes of pensioners were created:

(a) employees who were contributing to the Pension Scheme at salary exceeding INR 6,500, and were continuing in service as on 1 September 2014; (b) employees who were contributing to the Pension Scheme at salary capped at INR 6,500, and were continuing in service as on 1 September 2014; (c) employees who had retired prior to 1 September 2014 without exercising an option to contribute at higher salary (exceeding INR 6,500) towards the Pension Scheme; (d) employees who had retired prior to 1 September 2014 after exercising the option to contribute at higher salary (INR 6,500) to the Pension Scheme.

Given the differentiation created, the High Court observed that the EPF Act does not distinguish between members of a covered establishment and rather treats employees as a homogenous class. Accordingly, the benefits flowing from the EPF Act and the schemes (including Pension Scheme) should apply to the said class of employees uniformly. Consequently, the High Court held that such differentiation has no rational or statutory basis and capping the maximum pensionable salary at INR 15,000 per month would deprive most employees of a decent pension in their old age.

Additionally, the High Court struck down the requirement to contribute an additional 1.16% for employees contributing towards the Pension Scheme at a salary exceeding INR 15,000. It also held that computation of pension based on average monthly pay of 60 months instead of 12 months will reduce pension significantly, and therefore struck this down as well. In this respect, the Employees' Provident Fund Organization (EPFO) argued that the 12-month timeframe would lead to depletion of the pension fund. However, the court rejected this argument owing to the lack of any supporting evidence from the EPFO.

SC Ruling - Analysis and Impact

The SC reaffirmed the Kerala HC ruling that struck down the 2014 Amendment. Consequently, employees covered under the EPF Act will now be eligible for a higher pension, since employees can now contribute towards their pension fund at their uncapped salary and the basis for calculation of pensionable salary will be the salary received over the last 12 months instead of 60 months preceding the date of exit from the Pension Scheme. Also, since the 2014 Amendment has been struck down in its entirety, it appears that the salary ceiling for pension shall revert to INR 6,500.

However, this judgement leaves certain questions unanswered. It is unclear if this will apply retrospectively, thereby allowing employees who were completely excluded from the Pension Scheme by the 2014 Amendment, as well as those who didn't opt for higher pension payments within the six-month opt-in window, to seek retrospective coverage (and accordingly a diversion of contributions previously made into their EPF account, into their Pension account). Going by the R.C. Gupta ruling, one can surmise this would apply retrospectively. In R.C. Gupta and Ors. v Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees' Provident Fund Organisation and Ors. (decided on 4 October 2016), the Supreme Court struck down the six-month opt-in window from 1 September 2014 (for employees to continue making uncapped pension contributions) and directed the EPFO to adjust the funds from the EPF account to the pension account for such employees to allow higher pension pay outs. However, despite the decision of the Supreme Court in the R.C. Gupta case, the EPFO has not been accepting applications in this respect from employees working in exempt establishments (i.e. establishments that maintain a PF trust). This approach by the EPFO appears to be without any reasonable basis since the applicability of the R.C. Gupta ruling to exempt establishments has been re-affirmed by the Rajasthan High Court recently (in the case of Anil Kumar Sharma And Ors vs U O I And Ors).

Further, the SC Ruling shall have an impact on IWs, as they would also be eligible to be covered under the Pension Scheme. Employers need to therefore ensure that they are making contributions towards the Pension Scheme for IWs as well.

Undoubtedly, the SC Ruling is a positive measure for employees promising them higher pension payments. However, the judgement is also being criticized for not taking cognizance of the fact that the EPFO may actually not be able to bear the additional cost burden associated with higher pension contributions. Back-of-the-envelope calculations show that contributions made over an employee's career may not be sufficient to back the pension payments that would eventually have to be made, adding significant pressure on the EPFO. The 2014 Amendment had attempted to limit the member base of the pension scheme, which has been undone by the SC ruling, thereby expanding the pension membership, including to high income individuals.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions