Daimler AG has entered an agreement with patent licensing pool Avanci covering standard-essential 4G patents. Avanci acts as a one-stop marketplace for standard-essential patents owned by 47 companies, including Ericsson and Qualcomm, which cover 4G, 3G and 2G technology used in connected vehicles. Avanci last year launched a new patent pool for the auto industry covering 5G standard-essential patents, after the U.S. Department of Justice concluded that it was unlikely to harm competition.
Since Avanci does not own any patents itself, any infringement litigation over the patents in the pool is undertaken by its individual patent owners. Several Avanci members have sued Daimler AG for infringement in Germany in recent years. Daimler AG is the latest automaker to reach a license agreement with Avanci, heading off potential piecemeal infringement suits by its individual members.
The move of Diamler to get along with the standard essential patent from the Avanci pool is set to give Diamler an upper hand over its 4G technology and services. The Avanci pool has various licensors which include Qualcomm, Nokia, Ericsson as well as dozens of other companies around the globe.
Avanci 's approach of licensing the end product instead of taking the component has been rejected by Daimler AG originally. It was for this reason that the Nokia and Daimler AG patent infringement lasted for two years where finally both the company entered into a bilateral license agreement which was announced on June 1, 2021. Prior to the settlement, an EU Antitrust complaint was also brought by Daimler AG against Nokia as Nokia refused to grant Daimler AG suppliers for an SEP license.
Daimler AG also took into the bilateral licensing with Sharp, a Japanese electronics giant and non-practicing entity Conversant Wireless, prior to settling with Nokia. These companies were those who had sued Daimler AG over patent infringement thereafter, resulting in getting into bilateral license, where all of those were among the Avanci pool of licensors.
Licensing of one portfolio at a time, which is of piecemeal resolution, turning out to be uneconomic and uncertain over litigation, therefore Daimler AG decided for a one-stop solution. Being an uneconomic venture and with more litigation involving uncertainty, adopting a one stop solution was a good move for Daimler AG. In the alternative, one can presume that one Avanci licensor after the other would have wanted Daimler AG to take a bilateral license. If you're a Qualcomm or an Ericsson, why would you not want to get paid if Nokia does? If you're an Unwired Planet or Longhorn IP, why wouldn't you want to collect royalties if Daimler AG took a license from Conversant? Why would anyone condone an ongoing infringement while similarly situated patent holders are raking in license fees? Daimler AG avoided a lot of issues by signing a deal with Avanci.
If we compare German Car makers, BMW took the 4G Avanci license and was the first to do so in January 2017. This was followed by two major companies that were Volkswagen subsidiaries Audi and Porsche. Moreover, other car makers in the Volkswagen Group took a 3G license. Meanwhile, they were sued by Acer because of its license not covering the 4G standard Volkswagen actually implements. In the German Nokia cases, the Avanci's car level licensing model was accepted by the German car makers which was held against Daimler AG. It will be interesting to see Daimler AG getting along with that of the licensing deal and weighing upon other car maker's FRAND arguments.
Daimler AG And Avanci Enters Patent Licensing Deal
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
