Mondaq USA: Intellectual Property
Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP
The Office pointed to the drafting history of the petitioner estoppel provision to support its views.
Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P
In affirming the PTAB, the Federal Circuit also assumed for the purposes of its decision that compound 31 was an appropriate lead compound.
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Can artists legally protect their dance moves?
Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
In this patent infringement action, the plaintiff, Stuebing Automatic Machine Co. ("Stuebing") filed a motion for violation of multiple discovery orders against the defendant.
Berman Fink Van Horn P.C.
Where's the line between legitimately protecting your business's trade secrets and misusing a trade secret to conceal fraudulent activity?
Orrick
Last November, we discussed the potential impact of a recent California appellate court decision, AMN Healthcare, Inc. v. Aya Healthcare Services, Inc. ...
Ward and Smith, P.A.
In SummitBridge National Investments III, LLC v. Faison, the Fourth Circuit held that if a lender's loan documents contain an attorneys' fees provision, then the lender may file a claim
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
The Board dismissed this petition for cancellation of Roman Atwood's registration for the mark SMILE MORE for various goods (stickers, backpacks, shirts) and for retail store service featuring clothing, denying petitioner's claim that the term fails to function as a mark.
Foley Hoag LLP
If you haven't heard already, New York Fashion Week is here! As usual, a lineup of awe-inspiring shows is expected to roll out over the next several days
Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP
In Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene's Energy Group, LLC, et al., Justice Thomas, writing for a 7-2 majority of the Supreme Court, explained that inter partes review proceedings do not violate Article III or...
Mintz
Recently, in ZTE (USA) Inc. v. Fundamental Innovation Int'l LLC, IPR2018-00425, Paper No. 34 (Feb. 6, 2019) ...
Stites & Harbison PLLC
At the beginning of this new year, it helps to remind ourselves why we engage in this work, why trademarks matter, and, more particularly, why registration matters.
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
This guest post was written by Stephanie Grace Stella, an associate in the Trademark Group at Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
Holland & Knight
A previous post on this blog (Nov. 20, 2018) analyzed state laws that require a plaintiff suing for trade secret misappropriation to identify its alleged trade secret(s) with particularity,
Ropes & Gray LLP
In Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. (here), the Federal Circuit was poised to explore the level of biosimilar legwork that could satisfy Article III ...
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
The "internet of things" (IoT) is revolutionizing how people live and work. Each day, the IoT grows as companies look for even more ways to connect devices with the goal of collecting and reporting
Cooley LLP
The Big Question. What is the effect of rejection of a trademark license by a debtor-licensor? Over the past few years, this blog has followed the Tempnology case out of New Hampshire raising just that issue.
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
In a whopper of a decision, the Cancellation Division of the EU Intellectual Property Office ("EUIPO") revoked McDonald's BIG MAC EU trade mark registration.
Pryor Cashman LLP
For the sixth straight year, Pryor Cashman's Trademark practice has been named among the best in the United States by World Trademark Review - WTR 1000.
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
White Horse Wash opposed the application of White Horse Auto to register the mark WHITE HORSE AUTO for automobile dealerships [AUTO disclaimed], claiming a likelihood of confusion with opposer's mark WHITE HORSE AUTO WASH for "automobile and vehicle washing; automobile and vehicle detailing" [AUTO WASH disclaimed].
Latest Video
Most Popular Recent Articles
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP
The 2018 California legislative session was another busy year with numerous employment-related bill signed into law.
Duane Morris LLP
In 2014, Elon Musk announced that he was "open-sourcing" Tesla's patents.
BakerHostetler
Partners Carl Hittinger and Jeffry Duffy authored an article published by The Legal Intelligencer on July 27, 2018.
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz
Vermont's new Data Broker Regulation ("Regulation") takes effect on January 1, 2019.
Cooley LLP
As 2019 kicks off, the Cooley antitrust group highlights 10 recent developments and trends corporate counsel should be aware of – from the US Supreme Court and lower courts, the DoJ and FTC ...
Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P
Further information regarding any adjustments to the USPTO's operating status will be posted on the USPTO website and delivered to the news media.
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
The nature of patent litigation in the cybersecurity industry is likely to change very soon. Non-practicing entities, sometimes called "patent trolls," started some time ago to sue for patent
BakerHostetler
On Jan. 4, 2019, the USPTO announced revised guidance relevant to Section 101 rejections ("2019 Revised Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Guidance").
Womble Bond Dickinson
In Berkheimer and Aatrix, the Federal Circuit indicated that although patent eligibility under Section 101 is ultimately a question of law, the determination may have factual underpinnings
Foley & Lardner
The Supreme Court's decisions in Mayo v. Prometheus and Alice Corp v. CLS Bank created a three-part test for determining subject matter eligibility of patent claims under 35 U.S.C. §101 ...
Article Search Using Filters
Related Topics
Mondaq Advice Center (MACs)
Popular Authors
Popular Contributors
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
Partners
In association with